PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the temporal profile of serial levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and prolactin in serum from patients after single epileptic seizures. METHODS: Measurement of NSE and prolactin by sensitive immunoassays in 21 patients with complex partial seizure (CPSs: n = 11) and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCSs; n = 10) during continuous video-EEG monitoring at four different time points (1, 3, 6, and 24 h after ictal event). Statistical analysis was performed by using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. RESULTS: Mean+/-SD values for NSE levels (ng/ml) were 12.5 +/-4.4 (1 h), 10.8+/-3.8 (3 h), 11.1+/-4.9 (6 h), and 8.2+/-1.9 (24 h). The corresponding prolactin levels (mU/L) were 1,311+/-1,034, 232+/-158, 237+/-175, and 251+/-98. There was a significant decrease of NSE and prolactin levels over time (p < 0.001). The pair-wise comparison of NSE levels showed significant differences between the time points 1 vs. 24 h (p < 0.001), 3 vs. 24 h (p = 0.007), and 6 vs. 24 h (p = 0.009). In contrast, serum prolactin levels showed a significant difference between 1 vs. 3 h (p < 0.001) only. Most of the NSE levels remained normal after CPSs and SGTCSs. At 1 h after the seizure, only 33% of the subjects had increased NSE, whereas abnormal prolactin levels occurred with a sensitivity of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to prolactin, serum NSE is not a sensitive marker of individual seizures. Only some individuals showed an increase of NSE beyond the prolactin-sensitive time frame after a single seizure, and mean NSE levels were not significantly increased compared with those of normal controls.
PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the temporal profile of serial levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and prolactin in serum from patients after single epileptic seizures. METHODS: Measurement of NSE and prolactin by sensitive immunoassays in 21 patients with complex partial seizure (CPSs: n = 11) and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCSs; n = 10) during continuous video-EEG monitoring at four different time points (1, 3, 6, and 24 h after ictal event). Statistical analysis was performed by using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. RESULTS: Mean+/-SD values for NSE levels (ng/ml) were 12.5 +/-4.4 (1 h), 10.8+/-3.8 (3 h), 11.1+/-4.9 (6 h), and 8.2+/-1.9 (24 h). The corresponding prolactin levels (mU/L) were 1,311+/-1,034, 232+/-158, 237+/-175, and 251+/-98. There was a significant decrease of NSE and prolactin levels over time (p < 0.001). The pair-wise comparison of NSE levels showed significant differences between the time points 1 vs. 24 h (p < 0.001), 3 vs. 24 h (p = 0.007), and 6 vs. 24 h (p = 0.009). In contrast, serum prolactin levels showed a significant difference between 1 vs. 3 h (p < 0.001) only. Most of the NSE levels remained normal after CPSs and SGTCSs. At 1 h after the seizure, only 33% of the subjects had increased NSE, whereas abnormal prolactin levels occurred with a sensitivity of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to prolactin, serum NSE is not a sensitive marker of individual seizures. Only some individuals showed an increase of NSE beyond the prolactin-sensitive time frame after a single seizure, and mean NSE levels were not significantly increased compared with those of normal controls.
Authors: John M Gledhill; Elizabeth J Brand; John R Pollard; Richard D St Clair; Todd M Wallach; Peter B Crino Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stefania Mondello; Johanna Palmio; Jackson Streeter; Ronald L Hayes; Jukka Peltola; Andreas Jeromin Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 2.474