Literature DB >> 10368035

Relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in clinical therapy.

L E Gerweck1, S V Kozin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In clinical proton beam radiation therapy, an RBE of 1.1 relative to megavoltage X-rays is currently being employed at most treatment centers. This RBE pertains to radiation in the spread out Bragg-peak (SOBP) for all tissue systems, all dose levels per fraction and all proton beam energies. As the number of centers and treatment sites for which proton beam therapy continues to increase and additional experimental data is accrued, a re-assessment of the justification for a generic RBE is warranted. In this paper we address: (1) the constancy of the RBE along the central axis from the plateau entrance to the distal SOBP (upstream of the distal edge); (2) RBE as a function of dose (or cell survival level); and (3) the target cell or tissue (alpha/beta) dependency of the RBE. This analysis pertains to modulated proton beams of initial energies of approximately 70-200 MeV and SOBPs of approximately 2-10 cm, respectively. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: With exceptions, the available experimental data indicate that the RBE of SOBP protons increases with decreasing dose or dose per fraction and increasing depth in the SOBP, with the magnitude of both effects likely being dependent on the alpha/beta ratios of the target cells or tissues. The use of a generic RBE of 1. for all tissues, especially those exhibiting low alpha/beta values such as CNS, may be too low, especially at dose levels of < or = 2 Gy/fraction. Systematic determination of the RBE values dependent upon the three interdependent variables identified in this manuscript (beam depth, dose size and target tissue) will provide an enhanced data base for detailed treatment planning and institutional trial comparisons, thereby maximizing the therapeutic benefit of proton beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368035     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00092-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  48 in total

Review 1.  Charged-particle therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Heath D Skinner; Theodore S Hong; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 2.  Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs.

Authors:  C von Neubeck; A Seidlitz; H H Kitzler; B Beuthien-Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2015.

Authors:  David G Pfister; Sharon Spencer; David M Brizel; Barbara Burtness; Paul M Busse; Jimmy J Caudell; Anthony J Cmelak; A Dimitrios Colevas; Frank Dunphy; David W Eisele; Robert L Foote; Jill Gilbert; Maura L Gillison; Robert I Haddad; Bruce H Haughey; Wesley L Hicks; Ying J Hitchcock; Antonio Jimeno; Merrill S Kies; William M Lydiatt; Ellie Maghami; Thomas McCaffrey; Loren K Mell; Bharat B Mittal; Harlan A Pinto; John A Ridge; Cristina P Rodriguez; Sandeep Samant; Jatin P Shah; Randal S Weber; Gregory T Wolf; Frank Worden; Sue S Yom; Nicole McMillian; Miranda Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 4.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ted C Ling; Joseph I Kang; David A Bush; Jerry D Slater; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Tobias Welte
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; David Ly; Tu D Dan; John Ondos; Holly Ning; Arnaud Belard; John O'Connell; Robert W Miller; Nicole L Simone
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Exponential Increase in Relative Biological Effectiveness Along Distal Edge of a Proton Bragg Peak as Measured by Deoxyribonucleic Acid Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  John J Cuaron; Chang Chang; Michael Lovelock; Daniel S Higginson; Dennis Mah; Oren Cahlon; Simon Powell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Technical considerations for noncoplanar proton-beam therapy of patients with tumors proximal to the optic nerve.

Authors:  Masashi Mizumoto; Hidetsugu Nakayama; Mari Tokita; Shinji Sugahara; Haruko Hashii; Takeji Sakae; Koji Tsuboi; Hideyuki Sakurai; Koichi Tokuuye
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Relative biological effectiveness of the 60-MeV therapeutic proton beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Beata Biesaga; Jan Swakoń; Damian Kabat; Leszek Grzanka; Marta Ptaszkiewicz; Urszula Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.