Literature DB >> 10366205

"Blind" placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures.

E H Kincaid1, P W Davis, M C Chang, J M Fenstermaker, T C Pennell.   

Abstract

Placement of long-term central venous access devices, such as Hickman catheters and implanted subcutaneous ports, has traditionally been performed in the operating room with fluoroscopy. This study reports our experience with percutaneous placement of these devices in the outpatient clinic setting without the use of real-time imaging. Results were generated from a prospective database of all adult patients undergoing placement of central venous access in the outpatient clinic of the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center. This database revealed that during the years 1996 and 1997, long-term central venous catheter placement was attempted in 589 adult patients in the outpatient clinic. Technical success was achieved in 558 patients (92%). This included 278 tunneled catheters and 280 totally implanted devices. Repositioning of the catheter tip was required in 16 patients (2.9%). The incidence of pneumothorax was 1.9 per cent. Late complications, including infection and thrombosis, occurred in 9 per cent. The average procedure-related charge for placement of a single-lumen central venous port in the outpatient clinic was $1691 versus $4559 in the operating room and $3890 in the radiology department. We conclude that routine placement of long-term central venous access devices in the outpatient clinic, without the use of real-time imaging, yields acceptable success rates and may have economic advantages over procedures performed in the operating room or radiology department.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10366205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Inadvertent port: catheter placement in azygos vein.

Authors:  K Harish; Y C Madhu
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-06

2.  Outcome of cephalic vein cut-down approach: A safe and feasible approach for totally implantable venous access device placement.

Authors:  Shinichiro Koketsu; Shinishi Samesima; Satomi Yoneyama; Toshiyuki Okada; Shigeru Tomozawa; Hiroyuki Horikoshi; Toshio Sawada
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Ultrasound-guided vein puncture versus surgical cut-down technique in totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADS): a prospective comparative study on safety, efficacy andcomplications.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cavallaro; Alessandro Sanguinetti; Olga Iorio; Giuseppe D'Ermo; Andrea Polistena; Nicola Avenia; Gianfranco Silecchia; Giorgio De Toma
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

4.  Central venous port systems as an integral part of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ulf K Teichgräber; Robert Pfitzmann; Herbert A F Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Wu; Po-Jen Ko; Ching-Yang Wu; Yun-Hen Liu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Hao-Jui Li; Hung-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Deltoid branch of thoracoacromial vein: a safe alternative entry vessel for intravenous port implantation.

Authors:  Ta-Wei Su; Ching-Feng Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Po-Jen Ko; Sheng-Yueh Yu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Hong-Chang Hsieh; Ching-Yang Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Cost and morbidity analysis of chest port insertion in adults: Outpatient clinic versus operating room placement.

Authors:  Claudio F Feo; Giorgio C Ginesu; Alessandro Bellini; Giuseppe Cherchi; Antonio M Scanu; Maria Laura Cossu; Alessandro Fancellu; Alberto Porcu
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.