Literature DB >> 10365096

Correlation between p53, c-erbB-2, and topoisomerase II alpha expression, DNA ploidy, hormonal receptor status and proliferation in 356 node-negative breast carcinomas: prognostic implications.

P Rudolph1, H Olsson, G Bonatz, V Ratjen, H Bolte, B Baldetorp, M Fernö, R Parwaresch, P Alm.   

Abstract

Various new prognostic indicators have been identified for mammary carcinomas, but the issue of their significance remains unsettled. The prognostic impact of p53, c-erbB-2, and topoisomerase II alpha expression was investigated in relation to standard prognostic factors for carcinomas of the breast and to the tumour cell growth fraction. Paraffin-embedded specimens of 356 node-negative infiltrating ductal carcinomas were stained immunohistochemically using a polyclonal antiserum to c-erbB-2, and the monoclonal antibodies DO-1 (p53), Ki-S4 (topoisomerase II alpha), and Ki-S5 (Ki-67). The patients were followed for a median duration of 99 months. Both p53 and c-erbB-2 were significantly associated with high tumour grade, large tumour size, DNA aneuploidy, lack of steroid hormone receptors, young age, and increased topoisomerase II alpha and Ki-67 expression levels. The correlation of p53 and c-erbB-2 was not significant. Topoisomerase II alpha and Ki-67 scores closely paralleled each other, indicating that both reflect the proliferative activity of tumour cells. A univariate analysis of overall (OS), specific (SS), and disease-free survival (DFS) revealed all the above-mentioned parameters to be statistically significant except patient age, which was relevant only to overall survival. Multivariate analysis with inclusion of all covariates selected tumour size and proliferation (topoisomerase II alpha and Ki-67) indices as independent predictors of survival in all three models. No additional information was gained by p53 or c-erbB-2. It is concluded that the proliferative activity, as assessed by topoisomerase II alpha or Ki-67 immunostaining, is the most useful indicator of breast cancer prognosis, except for tumour size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10365096     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199901)187:2<207::AID-PATH223>3.0.CO;2-U

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  25 in total

1.  Alterations in p53, BRCA1, ATM, PIK3CA, and HER2 genes and their effect in modifying clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival of Bulgarian patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Stefan S Bozhanov; Svetla G Angelova; Maria E Krasteva; Tsanko L Markov; Svetlana L Christova; Ivan G Gavrilov; Elena I Georgieva
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Utilizing prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Deepa S Subramaniam; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years.

Authors:  Attiqa N Mirza; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prognostic value of proliferation markers expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Natalija Dedić Plavetić; Jasminka Jakić-Razumović; Ana Kulić; Damir Vrbanec
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Comparative study of Her-2, p53, Ki-67 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer in a cohort of northern China female patients.

Authors:  Li Ding; Zijin Zhang; Yan Xu; Yongqiang Zhang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.269

6.  Predictive value of topoisomerase II alpha immunostaining in urothelial bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  L Nakopoulou; A Zervas; A C Lazaris; C Constantinides; C Stravodimos; P Davaris; C Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Cyclins D1 and D3 and topoisomerase II alpha in inactive pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  W Saeger; S Schreiber; D K Lüdecke
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.943

8.  Prognostic value of ki-67 in breast carcinoma: tissue microarray method versus whole section analysis- potentials and pitfalls.

Authors:  Natalija Dedić Plavetić; Jasminka Jakić-Razumović; Ana Kulić; Maja Sirotković-Skerlev; Marina Barić; Damir Vrbanec
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  The favourable prognostic value of oestrogen receptor beta immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  L Nakopoulou; A C Lazaris; E G Panayotopoulou; I Giannopoulou; N Givalos; S Markaki; A Keramopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Factors that influence the incidence of breast cancer in Arica, Chile (Review).

Authors:  Gloria M Calaf; Fresia Caba; Jorge Farias; Francisco Rothhammer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.