Literature DB >> 10363766

Are there discrete distal-proximal representations of the index finger and palm in the human somatosensory cortex? A neuromagnetic study.

I Hashimoto1, T Mashiko, T Kimura, T Imada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The distal-proximal representations of the finger and palm in the first somatosensory cortex (SI) were studied in humans.
METHODS: Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) from 11 subjects were measured, following mechanical stimulation of the skin by using a 122 channel whole head SQUID system. Sensory stimulus comprising of a 10 ms vibration at the frequency of 200 Hz was delivered to 6 successive sites in 3 cm increments, along the distal-proximal direction over the volar surface of the right index finger and palm. Using a single dipole model, the sources of the magnetic fields were estimated and mapped onto magnetic resonance images of each subject. ANOVA was used for statistics.
RESULTS: Source localization was determined on the main peak (M50) of the SEFs. All of the sources were located in the area 3b of SI. Contrary to the well-defined distal-proximal representations in the hand area of simian SI cortex, there was no statistically significant differences between the locations of the dipoles in human SI cortex evoked by stimulation of different sites.
CONCLUSION: The result, however, should be interpreted with caution, because it cannot be denied that the spatial separation of sources in the distal-proximal somatotopy is beyond the resolving capacity of magnetoencephalography (MEG). In addition, at variance with the discrete distal-proximal gradient in the mechanoreceptor density, there was no statistically significant differences between the signal strengths of the dipoles for stimulation of the different locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10363766     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00018-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  6 in total

1.  A new vibrotactile stimulator for functional MRI.

Authors:  G S Harrington; C T Wright; J H Downs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands.

Authors:  George A Michael; Marie-Agnès Dupuy; Amélie Deleuze; Margaux Humblot; Bilitys Simon; Janick Naveteur
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time.

Authors:  Johanna M Zumer; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Leah A Krubitzer; Zhao Zhu; Robert S Turner; Elizabeth A Disbrow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Relation between palm and finger cortical representations in primary somatosensory cortex: A 7T fMRI study.

Authors:  Michel Akselrod; Roberto Martuzzi; Wietske van der Zwaag; Olaf Blanke; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Case Report: Plasticity in Central Sensory Finger Representation and Touch Perception After Microsurgical Reconstruction of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Injury.

Authors:  Jennifer Ernst; Thomas Weiss; Nadine Wanke; Jens Frahm; Gunther Felmerer; Dario Farina; Arndt F Schilling; Meike A Wilke
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Individual fMRI maps of all phalanges and digit bases of all fingers in human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Meike A Schweisfurth; Jens Frahm; Renate Schweizer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.