Literature DB >> 10360727

Quality of life outcomes in left ventricular assist system inpatients and outpatients.

M A Dew1, R L Kormos, S Winowich, C J Nastala, H S Borovetz, L H Roth, J Sanchez, B P Griffith.   

Abstract

This study empirically evaluates the quality of life (QOL) effects associated with hospital discharge among heart transplant candidates whose lives are maintained by left ventricular support systems (LVAS). Thirty-five LVAS inpatients (18 Novacor, 17 Thoratec) received structured QOL assessments approximately 1 month after device implant. Ten of the patients (8 Novacor, 2 Thoratec) were subsequently discharged to either home or a home-like outpatient facility where their QOL was reassessed. The QOL of LVAS patients, before and after discharge, was compared with that of demographically similar nonhospitalized heart transplant candidates (n = 55) and recipients (n = 97). Their caregivers' QOL was also assessed. The QOL of LVAS outpatients showed statistically significant (p<0.05) advantages over remaining LVAS inpatients and nonhospitalized heart candidates. Advantages appeared in physical, emotional, and social functioning domains. The QOL of LVAS outpatients also improved (p<0.05) over their own QOL before discharge, with the greatest change in physical functional and emotional status. The QOL of LVAS outpatients most closely resembled QOL in the transplant recipients. Family caregivers to LVAS outpatients reported some increases in caregiving burden after patient discharge, but their overall well being was not adversely affected. These data provide an empiric basis for the provision of outpatient programs as appropriate care for eligible LVAS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10360727     DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199905000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  7 in total

1.  A preliminary investigation of symptom pattern and prevalence before and up to 6 months after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Jesus M Casida; Jessica Parker
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Caring for a spouse with end-stage heart failure through implantation of a left ventricular assist device as destination therapy.

Authors:  Lisa A Kitko; Judith E Hupcey; Juliann H Gilchrist; John P Boehmer
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.210

3.  End-stage heart failure and mechanical circulatory support: feasibility of discharge from hospital.

Authors:  A Oosterom; N de Jonge; J H Kirkels; B F M Rodermans; E Sukkel; C Klöpping; F Ramjankhan; J R Lahpor
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  A review of ethical considerations for ventricular assist device placement in older adults.

Authors:  Courtenay R Bruce
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 5.  Learning self-care after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Naoko Kato; Tiny Jaarsma; Tuvia Ben Gal
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-09

6.  2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Christiaan Antonides; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Alain Combes; Gloria Färber; Margaret M Hannan; Marian Kukucka; Nicolaas de Jonge; Antonio Loforte; Lars H Lund; Paul Mohacsi; Michiel Morshuis; Ivan Netuka; Mustafa Özbaran; Federico Pappalardo; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Martin Schweiger; Steven Tsui; Daniel Zimpfer; Finn Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Relationship between device acceptance and patient-reported outcomes in Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) recipients.

Authors:  Crispino Tosto; Luigi Adamo; Heidi Craddock; Maria Di Blasi; Rosario Girgenti; Francesco Clemenza; Robert M Carney; Gregory Ewald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.