Literature DB >> 10359316

Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with aging.

T Oshika1, S D Klyce, R A Applegate, H C Howland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether corneal wavefront aberrations vary with aging.
METHODS: One hundred two eyes of 102 normal subjects were evaluated with videokeratography. The data were decomposed using Taylor and Zernike polynomials to calculate the monochromatic aberrations of the cornea for both small (3-mm) and large (7-mm) pupils.
RESULTS: For a 3-mm pupil, the amount of total aberrations (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r(s) = 0.145; P = 0.103) and spherical-like aberrations (r(s) = -0.068; P = 0.448) did not change with aging, whereas comalike aberrations exhibited a weak but statistically significant correlation with age (r(s) = 0.256; P = 0.004). For a 7-mm pupil, total aberrations (r(s) = 0.552; P < 0.001) and comalike aberrations (r(s) = 0.561; P < 0.001) significantly increased with aging, but spherical-like aberrations showed no age-related changes (r(s) = 0.124; P = 0.166). Simulated pupillary dilation from 3 mm to 7 mm caused a 38.0+/-28.5-fold increase in the total aberrations, and the extent of increases significantly correlated with age (r(s) = 0.354; P < 0.001). Pupillary dilation influenced the comalike aberrations more in the older subjects than in the younger subjects (r(s) = 0.243; P = 0.006), but such age dependence was not found for spherical-like aberrations (r(s) = 0.141; P = 0.115).
CONCLUSIONS: Comalike aberrations of the cornea correlate with age, implying that the corneas become less symmetrical along with aging. Spherical-like aberrations do not vary significantly with aging. Pupillary dilation markedly increases wavefront aberrations, and those effects are more prominent in older subjects than in younger subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10359316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  32 in total

1.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Effect of sampling on real ocular aberration measurements.

Authors:  Lourdes Llorente; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  [The aspheric blue light filter IOL AcrySof IQ compared to the AcrySof SA60AT : influence of IOL power, pupil diameter, and corneal asphericity on postoperative spherical aberration].

Authors:  U Mester; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Influence of age on optical aberrations of the human eye].

Authors:  M Jahnke; C Wirbelauer; D T Pham
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Luis Lesmes; Li-Xia Feng; Liming Tao; Yi-Feng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  In vitro optical performance of a new aberration-free intraocular lens.

Authors:  D Madrid-Costa; J Ruiz-Alcocer; T Ferrer-Blasco; S García-Lázaro; R Montés-Micó
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Influence of tilt and decentration of scleral-sutured intraocular lens on ocular higher-order wavefront aberration.

Authors:  T Oshika; G Sugita; K Miyata; T Tokunaga; T Samejima; C Okamoto; Y Ishii
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Crystalline lens paradoxes revisited: significance of age-related restructuring of the GRIN.

Authors:  Conor J Sheil; Alexander V Goncharov
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Role of high-order aberrations in senescent changes in spatial vision.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Julia W Evans; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Comparison of higher-order aberrations between eyes with natural supervision and highly myopic eyes in Koreans.

Authors:  Min Kim; Young Gi Lee; Kyung Ryul Seo; Eung Kweon Kim; Hyung Keun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.