Literature DB >> 10357873

Units of analysis in nonword reading: evidence from children and adults.

G D Brown1, R P Deavers.   

Abstract

Four experiments examined variations in children's (chronological age range: 5 years 7 months to 9 years 10 months) and adults' reading strategy as a function of task demands. Experiment 1 found that less skilled readers (mean reading age: 8 years 8 months), though able to make use of rime-based spelling-to-sound correspondences (reading "by analogy"), predominantly used simple grapheme-phoneme-level correspondences in reading isolated unfamiliar items. Skilled children (mean reading age: 11 years 6 months) were more likely to adopt an analogy strategy. Experiments 2 and 3 adopted versions of the "clue word" technique used by U. Goswami (1986, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83; 1988, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 239-268) and found a much higher incidence of analogical responding by children of all ages, suggesting that reading strategy is task-dependent. Experiment 4 showed that adults' nonword-reading strategy is determined by list composition, in that grapheme-phoneme correspondences are used more when the list context contains nonwords. It is concluded that both adults and young children exhibit considerable flexibility and task-dependence in the levels of spelling-to-sound correspondence (analogies vs decoding) that they use and that grapheme-phoneme correspondences are preferred when maximum generalization to unfamiliar items is required. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10357873     DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  8 in total

1.  The influence of reading unit size on the development of Stroop interference in early word decoding.

Authors:  Paula J Schwanenflugel; Robin D Morris; Melanie R Kuhn; Gregory P Strauss; Jennifer M Sieczko
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2008-04-01

2.  Reading Skill and Exposure to Orthography Influence Speech Production.

Authors:  Meredith Saletta; Lisa Goffman; Diane Brentari
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2015-04-13

3.  Word and Person Effects on Decoding Accuracy: A New Look at an Old Question.

Authors:  Jennifer K Gilbert; Donald L Compton; Devin M Kearns
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2011-05-01

4.  Pronouncing novel graphemes: the role of consonantal context.

Authors:  Stuart E Bernstein; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

5.  The Clock Counts - Length Effects in English Dyslexic Readers.

Authors:  S Provazza; D Giofrè; A-M Adams; D J Roberts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 6.  Early literacy experiences constrain L1 and L2 reading procedures.

Authors:  Adeetee Bhide
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-02

7.  Costs and Benefits of Orthographic Inconsistency in Reading: Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Comparison.

Authors:  Chiara Valeria Marinelli; Cristina Romani; Cristina Burani; Victoria A McGowan; Pierluigi Zoccolotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  What Is Going on with Visual Attention in Reading and Dyslexia? A Critical Review of Recent Studies.

Authors:  Conrad Perry; Heidi Long
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.