Literature DB >> 10357113

Application of statistical graphics to facilitate selection of health status measures for clinical practice and evaluative research.

G Stucki1, M H Liang, S Stucki, J N Katz, R A Lew.   

Abstract

Relatively little attention has been directed towards the study of the ability of health status measures to demonstrate clinically meaningful change. We examined the use of Tukey's stem and leaf plots and time-path diagrams to assess the sensitivity of a health status measure in showing change. We compared the evaluative characteristics of the physical ability scales of the Sickness Impact Profile (PSIP), and the SF-36 (PSF-36), in 54 consecutive patients undergoing elective primary or revision total hip replacement. To validate time-path diagrams, we used patients' perception of change in physical function (transition question) as an external standard. At baseline there was no clustering at the end of the scales. At 3 months, the distribution of the PSIP showed a clustering at the upper end of the scale and a strong skewness towards lower scores, whereas the PSF-36 showed a wide distribution of the scores. Seven out of 54 patients had perfectly normal scores on the PSIP at 3 months, whereas one patient had a perfect score on the PSF-36 at 3 months. In time-path diagrams the response pattern of the PSIP was similar to that of the PSF-36, with the exception of the patient-fifth with the best initial health status. The overall impression of the time-path diagram for these patients was that of no change. A closer examination revealed that half of these patients had horizontal or downwards sloping lines, indicating a worsening in physical function. However, all these patients perceived themselves as improved. The PSIP has a ceiling effect for patients with relatively good physical health. It was concluded that stem and leaf plots are useful in the assessment of health status measures, for discriminative purposes, to differentiate patients' health cross-sectionally. Time-path diagrams stratified by baseline health status with information on patients' perception or valuation of change provide useful information about the ability of an instrument to detect change over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10357113     DOI: 10.1007/s100670050065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  10 in total

1.  The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set.

Authors:  Kristina Harris; Christopher R Lim; Jill Dawson; Ray Fitzpatrick; David J Beard; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Validation of Asthma Control Assessment Among Urban Adolescents Using the Asthma Control and Communication Instrument.

Authors:  Sande O Okelo; Andrew L Bilderback; Maria Fagnano; Jill S Halterman
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-10-11

3.  Translation and validation of the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index for use in Nigeria.

Authors:  C N Asoegwu; C C Nwawolo; N U Okubadejo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; I F Petersson; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Performance of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.

Authors:  Christina J Hajewski; Jacqueline E Baron; Natalie A Glass; Kyle R Duchman; Matthew Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Robert W Westermann
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-04-21

6.  The Korean Version of the Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire for Nursing Students in South Korea: Validity and Reliability Study.

Authors:  Minjoo Hong; Jennie C De Gagne; Hyewon Shin; Suhye Kwon; Gum-Hee Choi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Binocular summation is affected by crowding and tagging.

Authors:  Ziv Siman-Tov; Maria Lev; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the 24-Item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire.

Authors:  Rodrigo G M De Mendonça; Lucas M Bergamascki; Karla C M da Silva; Olavo B Letaif; Raphael Marcon; Alexandre F Cristante; Hiroko Matsumoto; Michel G Vitale; Robert Meves
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set.

Authors:  Christopher R Lim; Kristina Harris; Jill Dawson; David J Beard; Ray Fitzpatrick; Andrew J Price
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The translation, validity and reliability of the German version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire.

Authors:  Katja Ehrenbrusthoff; Cormac G Ryan; Christian Grüneberg; Benedict M Wand; Denis J Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.