OBJECTIVES: To determine whether ethnic and other social factors affect how frequently do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are written, the timing of DNR orders, or patient involvement in the DNR decision. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: Patients who died in one urban teaching hospital on the medicine, cardiology, or family practice service during 1988 were eligible; 288 were included in the analyses. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to examine frequency of DNR orders and patient involvement; analysis of variance and linear regression were used to examine timing of the DNR orders. RESULTS: Non-whites were more likely than whites to have DNR orders (OR 1.76; 95% CI, 1.09-2.84) but timing of the DNR order did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity. Patients who spoke English fluently were more likely to be involved in the DNR decision than those who did not (OR 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61). Patients with documented human immunodeficiency virus were more likely than uninfected patients to have DNR orders (OR 3.51; 95% CI, 1.36-9.02), to be involved in the decision (OR 10.11; 95% CI, 4.87-21.00); and to have DNR orders written earlier (P = 0.02). Alcoholic patients were more likely than non-alcoholics to have DNR orders (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic and other social factors do appear to play a role in DNR decisions. It needs to be determined if these differences are due to patient preferences or clinician characteristics.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether ethnic and other social factors affect how frequently do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are written, the timing of DNR orders, or patient involvement in the DNR decision. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS:Patients who died in one urban teaching hospital on the medicine, cardiology, or family practice service during 1988 were eligible; 288 were included in the analyses. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to examine frequency of DNR orders and patient involvement; analysis of variance and linear regression were used to examine timing of the DNR orders. RESULTS: Non-whites were more likely than whites to have DNR orders (OR 1.76; 95% CI, 1.09-2.84) but timing of the DNR order did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity. Patients who spoke English fluently were more likely to be involved in the DNR decision than those who did not (OR 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61). Patients with documented human immunodeficiency virus were more likely than uninfected patients to have DNR orders (OR 3.51; 95% CI, 1.36-9.02), to be involved in the decision (OR 10.11; 95% CI, 4.87-21.00); and to have DNR orders written earlier (P = 0.02). Alcoholic patients were more likely than non-alcoholics to have DNR orders (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic and other social factors do appear to play a role in DNR decisions. It needs to be determined if these differences are due to patient preferences or clinician characteristics.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: Eve Wittenberg; Elkan Halpern; Nomia Divi; Lisa A Prosser; Sally S Araki; Jane C Weeks Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Henry S Perkins; Cynthia M A Geppert; Adelita Gonzales; Josie D Cortez; Helen P Hazuda Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Darin B Zahuranec; Devin L Brown; Lynda D Lisabeth; Nicole R Gonzales; Paxton J Longwell; Melinda A Smith; Nelda M Garcia; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Maureen E Lyon; Patricia A Garvie; Linda Briggs; Jianping He; Robert Malow; Lawrence J D'Angelo; Robert McCarter Journal: HIV AIDS (Auckl) Date: 2010-02-18