PURPOSE: To determine the value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nonenhanced helical CT scans in 82 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of pelvic ureterolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. Each calcification along the ureter was classified as a phlebolith or a ureteral calculus on the basis of clinical and imaging findings and was analyzed for the presence of a tail sign. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients each had a single ureteral calculus. None of these calculi were associated with a positive tail sign. Sixty-nine phleboliths were present in 35 patients. Forty-five phleboliths (65%) were associated with a positive tail sign. Of the remaining 24 phleboliths, 17 (25%) were associated with a negative tail sign and seven (10%) were indeterminate. The tail sign has a sensitivity of 65% (45 of 69; 95% CI: 53%, 75%) and a specificity of 100% (82 of 82; 95% CI: 96%, 100%) in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi. CONCLUSION: The tail sign is an important indicator that a suspicious calcification represents a phlebolith. Absence of the tail sign indicates that the calcification remains indeterminate.
PURPOSE: To determine the value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nonenhanced helical CT scans in 82 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of pelvic ureterolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. Each calcification along the ureter was classified as a phlebolith or a ureteral calculus on the basis of clinical and imaging findings and was analyzed for the presence of a tail sign. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients each had a single ureteral calculus. None of these calculi were associated with a positive tail sign. Sixty-nine phleboliths were present in 35 patients. Forty-five phleboliths (65%) were associated with a positive tail sign. Of the remaining 24 phleboliths, 17 (25%) were associated with a negative tail sign and seven (10%) were indeterminate. The tail sign has a sensitivity of 65% (45 of 69; 95% CI: 53%, 75%) and a specificity of 100% (82 of 82; 95% CI: 96%, 100%) in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi. CONCLUSION: The tail sign is an important indicator that a suspicious calcification represents a phlebolith. Absence of the tail sign indicates that the calcification remains indeterminate.
Authors: Thomas De Perrot; Jeremy Hofmeister; Simon Burgermeister; Steve P Martin; Gregoire Feutry; Jacques Klein; Xavier Montet Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ty K Subhawong; Elliot K Fishman; Jennifer E Swart; John A Carrino; Samer Attar; Laura M Fayad Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael M Maher; Mannudeep K Kalra; Stefania Rizzo; Peter R Mueller; Sanjay Saini Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2004 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Byung Hoon Chi; In Ho Chang; Dong Hoon Lee; Sung Bin Park; Kyung Do Kim; Young Tae Moon; Taekyu Hur Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.759