Literature DB >> 32107579

Differentiation of distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths using a convolutional neural network.

Johan Jendeberg1, Per Thunberg2, Mats Lidén3.   

Abstract

The objectives were to develop and validate a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using local features for differentiating distal ureteral stones from pelvic phleboliths, compare the CNN method with a semi-quantitative method and with radiologists' assessments and to evaluate whether the assessment of a calcification and its local surroundings is sufficient for discriminating ureteral stones from pelvic phleboliths in non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT). We retrospectively included 341 consecutive patients with acute renal colic and a ureteral stone on NECT showing either a distal ureteral stone, a phlebolith or both. A 2.5-dimensional CNN (2.5D-CNN) model was used, where perpendicular axial, coronal and sagittal images through each calcification were used as input data for the CNN. The CNN was trained on 384 calcifications, and evaluated on an unseen dataset of 50 stones and 50 phleboliths. The CNN was compared to the assessment by seven radiologists who reviewed a local 5 × 5 × 5 cm image stack surrounding each calcification, and to a semi-quantitative method using cut-off values based on the attenuation and volume of the calcifications. The CNN differentiated stones and phleboliths with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 94%, 90% and 92% and an AUC of 0.95. This was similar to a majority vote accuracy of 93% and significantly higher (p = 0.03) than the mean radiologist accuracy of 86%. The semi-quantitative method accuracy was 49%. In conclusion, the CNN differentiated ureteral stones from phleboliths with higher accuracy than the mean of seven radiologists' assessments using local features. However, more than local features are needed to reach optimal discrimination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Pelvic phlebolith; Ureteral calculi

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32107579      PMCID: PMC7867560          DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01180-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  19 in total

1.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Michael J Varanelli; Robert C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths.

Authors:  T V Bell; H M Fenlon; B D Davison; H K Ahari; S Hussain
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Modern imaging techniques in urinary stone disease.

Authors:  Tim Nestler; Stefan Haneder; Nils Große Hokamp
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Differentiation of ureteral stones and phleboliths using Hounsfield units on computerized tomography: a new method without observer bias.

Authors:  Yiloren Tanidir; Ahmet Sahan; Mehmet Kazim Asutay; Tarik Emre Sener; Farhad Talibzade; Asgar Garayev; Ilker Tinay; Cagri Akin Sekerci; Ferruh Simsek
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Deep Learning: A Primer for Radiologists.

Authors:  Gabriel Chartrand; Phillip M Cheng; Eugene Vorontsov; Michal Drozdzal; Simon Turcotte; Christopher J Pal; Samuel Kadoury; An Tang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Soft-tissue "rim" sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  J P Heneghan; N C Dalrymple; M Verga; A T Rosenfield; R C Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Unenhanced helical CT of ureterolithiasis: value of the tissue rim sign.

Authors:  A Kawashima; C M Sandler; I C Boridy; N Takahashi; G S Benson; S M Goldman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Investigation of the location of the ureteral stone and diameter of the ureter in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Ha-Jong Song; Sung-Tae Cho; Ki-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

10.  Size matters: The width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage.

Authors:  Johan Jendeberg; Håkan Geijer; Muhammed Alshamari; Bartosz Cierzniak; Mats Lidén
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Predicting narrow ureters before ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a neural network: a retrospective bicenter study.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Dawei Wang; Yong Wang; Shoutong Wang; Yi Shao; Jun Lu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.861

2.  A warning system for urolithiasis via retrograde intrarenal surgery using machine learning: an experimental study.

Authors:  Jinho Jeong; Kidon Chang; Jisuk Lee; Jongeun Choi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 3.  The Ascent of Artificial Intelligence in Endourology: a Systematic Review Over the Last 2 Decades.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Milap Shah; Nithesh Naik; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Hadis Karimi; Patrick Rice; Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis with a convolutional neural network algorithm for automated detection of urinary tract stones on plain X-ray.

Authors:  Masaki Kobayashi; Junichiro Ishioka; Yoh Matsuoka; Yuichi Fukuda; Yusuke Kohno; Keizo Kawano; Shinji Morimoto; Rie Muta; Motohiro Fujiwara; Naoko Kawamura; Tetsuo Okuno; Soichiro Yoshida; Minato Yokoyama; Rumi Suda; Ryota Saiki; Kenji Suzuki; Itsuo Kumazawa; Yasuhisa Fujii
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.