Literature DB >> 10344911

Docetaxel. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

H M Lamb1, L R Wiseman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Advanced breast cancer has a poor prognosis (median duration of survival about 2 years); thus, treatment options are largely palliative. Recent studies with the taxoids docetaxel and paclitaxel suggest that these agents are effective second-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Objective response rates range from 30 to 57% with docetaxel monotherapy in clinical trials in patients with advanced disease who had failed to respond to previous therapy, and the median time to disease progression ranges from 17 to 20 weeks. Currently available pharmacoeconomic data relating to docetaxel in the treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer include a cost-minimisation study and 3 cost-utility studies which relate to the UK, French and US healthcare systems. All analyses compared docetaxel with paclitaxel. Since no direct clinical comparisons of these 2 agents have been performed, model assumptions were based on available, rather than comparative, clinical data. The French model also considered vinorelbine monotherapy as a comparator. Considering direct costs only, costs associated with docetaxel ranged from < 0.3% less to 13% more than those of paclitaxel. When utilities were evaluated, docetaxel was associated with incremental gains versus paclitaxel of 33 and 75 additional days of quality-adjusted health in the UK and US studies, respectively, and 22 additional days of quality-adjusted progression-free survival (QPFS) in the French analysis. Thus, the incremental cost utility of docetaxel versus paclitaxel was an estimated Pounds 2431 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in the UK analysis (1994 values) and US$8615 per QALY in the US analysis (1997 values). The French model found that docetaxel cost 700 French francs less for the extra days of QPFS (1993 costs).
CONCLUSIONS: Cost-utility analyses, compiled in the absence of direct comparative data, show that docetaxel offers utility gains versus paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The incremental cost for these gains is within the accepted range for healthcare interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10344911     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199814040-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  37 in total

Review 1.  Progress in chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  G W Sledge; K H Antman
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 2.  A new decision model for cost-utility comparisons of chemotherapy in recurrent metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J Hutton; R Brown; M Borowitz; K Abrams; M Rothman; A Shakespeare
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Key issues in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Expectations and outcomes.

Authors:  R D Rubens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of autologous bone marrow transplantation in metastatic breast cancer. Estimates using decision analysis while awaiting clinical trial results.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cost-effectiveness of routine radiation therapy following conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Hayman; B E Hillner; J R Harris; J C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; H A Burris; G Cook; P Eisenberg; M Kane; W A Bierman; J Mortimer; E Genevois; R E Bellet
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Phase II trial of docetaxel: a new, highly effective antineoplastic agent in the management of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  V Valero; F A Holmes; R S Walters; R L Theriault; L Esparza; G Fraschini; G A Fonseca; R E Bellet; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Docetaxel. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fulton; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status.

Authors:  M L Rothman; S C Hedrick; K A Bulcroft; D H Hickam; L Z Rubenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Docetaxel: an update of its use in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  D P Figgitt; L R Wiseman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain.

Authors:  Carmen Frías; Javier Cortés; Miguel Ángel Seguí; Itziar Oyagüez; Miguel Ángel Casado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.405

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.