Literature DB >> 10344689

Functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period: emphasis on transabdominal approach.

P T Aitola1, K M Hiltunen, M J Matikainen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A variety of surgical procedures have been developed to treat rectal prolapse, but there is still no consensus on the operation of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse during an 11-year period in our department.
METHODS: All patients treated for complete rectal prolapse during an 11-year period, from 1985 to 1995, in a single university hospital were included. Of the 123 patients, 22 were men, and the mean age was 59 (range, 15-88) years. The medical records of all patients were reviewed retrospectively, and a questionnaire on bowel symptoms before and after surgery was sent to all 95 living patients.
RESULTS: The majority of the procedures (91 percent) were performed by abdominal approach, and the most frequently used open technique was posterior rectopexy with mesh (78 percent). Of the incontinent patients, 35 (63 percent), all those less than 40 years of age and 64 percent of those 40 years or older, were continent postoperatively (P = 0.0001) after a median follow-up of five (range, 1-72) months. According to the questionnaire, after a median follow-up of 85 (range, 16-144) months, only 38 percent of the incontinent patients in the mesh or suture group, 78 percent of patients less than 40 years of age (n = 18), and 52 percent of those 40 years or older (n = 47) claimed to be continent postoperatively. The proportion of patients with constipation was greater after the operation than preoperatively (P = 0.02) and more patients used medication for constipation after than before the operation (P = 0.0001). The overall complication rate was 15 percent, and the mortality rate was 1 percent (1/123). In the mesh or suture group there were 6 (6 percent) recurrent complete prolapses and 11 (12 percent) mucous prolapses.
CONCLUSION: Posterior rectopexy with mesh gave good results in our hands. Older age and longer follow-up seem to have a negative effect on the functional outcome of the operation and on the recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10344689     DOI: 10.1007/BF02234145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  24 in total

Review 1.  Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; P Sileri; M Grande; E De Luca; L Franceschilli; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Posterior sagittal approach for mesh rectopexy as a management of complete rectal in adults.

Authors:  Yehia Kosba; Walid Galal Elshazly; Walid Abd El Maksoud
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Abdominal approaches for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Bashar Safar; Anthony M Vernava
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

Review 4.  The role of synthetic and biologic materials in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ramon A Brown; C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

5.  Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: Will it be the Gold Standard?

Authors:  N Shastri-Hurst; D R McArthur
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; G Pellino; R Ghiselli; A Infantino; F Pucciani; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Optimizing Treatment for Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Jennifer Hrabe; Brooke Gurland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

8.  Functional outcome after perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Franc H Hetzer; Amir H Roushan; Katja Wolf; Ulrich Beutner; Jan Borovicka; Jochen Lange; Lukas Marti
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic posterior rectopexy (Wells) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. A prospective study.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Dulucq; Pascal Wintringer; Ahmad Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in an elderly population with external rectal prolapse: clinical and anal manometric results.

Authors:  Trine Bjerke; Tommie Mynster
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.