Literature DB >> 10342624

The 'instantaneous' compressive modulus of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb.

D E Shepherd1, B B Seedhom.   

Abstract

METHODS: The instantaneous compressive modulus of articular cartilage was surveyed in 11 sets of human lower limb joints obtained from the ipsilateral side. The average modulus for the entire joint surface of each joint and the topographical variations in the modulus within each joint were examined for all 11 sets, and subjected to statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Within each set of joints (hip, knee and ankle), the ankle always had a significantly greater mean compressive modulus than the hip and knee (P < 0.001-P < 0.05). In seven sets of joints, there was no significant difference between the mean compressive moduli of the knee and hip joints. In three sets of joints, the compressive modulus of the knee was significantly greater than that of the hip (P < 0.001-P < 0.01), while in only one set of joints was the compressive modulus of the hip significantly greater than that of the knee (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The topographical variations in the cartilage instantaneous compressive modulus over the surfaces of the lower limb joints were matched by differences in the stresses occurring in different areas of each joint. The results of the present study corroborate previous findings and show that the site-specific stresses and corresponding values of the instantaneous cartilage compressive modulus over the surfaces of lower limb joints were correlated (r = 0.82 at P < 0.01), thus adding credence to the conditioning hypothesis of cartilage by prevalent stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10342624     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.2.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  49 in total

1.  Validation of finite element predictions of cartilage contact pressure in the human hip joint.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Finite element model of the knee for investigation of injury mechanisms: development and validation.

Authors:  Ali Kiapour; Ata M Kiapour; Vikas Kaul; Carmen E Quatman; Samuel C Wordeman; Timothy E Hewett; Constantine K Demetropoulos; Vijay K Goel
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 3.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Mechanical viability of a thermoplastic elastomer hydrogel as a soft tissue replacement material.

Authors:  Kristine M Fischenich; Jackson T Lewis; Travis S Bailey; Tammy L Haut Donahue
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-01-10

5.  Novel biodegradable poly(propylene fumarate)-co-poly(l-lactic acid) porous scaffolds fabricated by phase separation for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Xifeng Liu; A Lee Miller; Brian E Waletzki; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.361

6.  Subject-specific finite element modeling of the tibiofemoral joint based on CT, magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic stereo-radiography data in vivo.

Authors:  Robert E Carey; Liying Zheng; Ameet K Aiyangar; Christopher D Harner; Xudong Zhang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  The effect of connective tissue material uncertainties on knee joint mechanics under isolated loading conditions.

Authors:  Yasin Y Dhaher; Tae-Hyun Kwon; Megan Barry
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A statistically-augmented computational platform for evaluating meniscal function.

Authors:  Hongqiang Guo; Thomas J Santner; Tony Chen; Hongsheng Wang; Caroline Brial; Susannah L Gilbert; Matthew F Koff; Amy L Lerner; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Experimental validation of a tibiofemoral model for analyzing joint force distribution.

Authors:  Emily J Miller; Rose F Riemer; Tammy L Haut Donahue; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Cartilage thickness: factors influencing multidetector CT measurements in a phantom study.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.