Literature DB >> 10341942

What pattern the eye sees best.

U Polat1, C W Tyler.   

Abstract

The visibility of gratings improves with increasing stimulus area. This effect is usually interpreted as being due to physiological summation within the extent of the largest spatial filter and due to probability summation between the outputs of linear, independent filters beyond that range. It is generally assumed that this improvement is isotropic to the patch configuration. In contrast, the existence of long-range facilitation that is configuration-specific suggests that the visibility of a local contrast is dependent on the spatial configuration of the stimuli. We measured contrast thresholds for circular and elongated Gabor patches with a static carrier. The patch envelope orientation was either the same as the bar orientation (collinear) or orthogonal to it. Contrast sensitivity was highest for elongated configurations that were collinear with the grating bars, and reached maximal efficiency at a length of about four grating cycles (eight bar widths), but a width of only one cycle.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10341942     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00245-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  Amblyopes see true alignment where normal observers see illusory tilt.

Authors:  A V Popple; D M Levi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial structure of neuronal receptive field in awake monkey secondary visual cortex (V2).

Authors:  Lu Liu; Liang She; Ming Chen; Tianyi Liu; Haidong D Lu; Yang Dan; Mu-ming Poo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Disclosing disease mechanisms with a spatio-temporal summation paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Rebecca K O'Loughlin; Robyn H Guymer; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.

Authors:  John M Foley; Srinivasa Varadharajan; Chin C Koh; Mylene C Q Farias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Horizontal connectivity in V1: Prediction of coherence in contour and motion integration.

Authors:  Benoit Le Bec; Xoana G Troncoso; Christophe Desbois; Yannick Passarelli; Pierre Baudot; Cyril Monier; Marc Pananceau; Yves Frégnac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Spatio-temporal low-level neural networks account for visual masking.

Authors:  Uri Polat; Anna Sterkin; Oren Yehezkel
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

7.  Simple cell response properties imply receptive field structure: balanced Gabor and/or bandlimited field functions.

Authors:  Davis Cope; Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Suppressive lateral interactions at parafoveal representations in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Arezoo Pooresmaeili; Jose L Herrero; Matthew W Self; Pieter R Roelfsema; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Synaptic Correlates of Low-Level Perception in V1.

Authors:  Florian Gerard-Mercier; Pedro V Carelli; Marc Pananceau; Xoana G Troncoso; Yves Frégnac
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast.

Authors:  Takuji Kasamatsu; Rich Miller; Zhao Zhu; Michael Chang; Yoshiyuki Ishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.