Literature DB >> 10340588

Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype.

J Noblet1, C Karege, S Dubois, J van Milgen.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in which the metabolic utilization of energy was measured in individually penned pigs from seven groups that differed in genotype and(or) sex and ranged in body weight between 20 and 107 kg. The animals were fed a diet containing, on a DM basis, 14.7 MJ ME and at least 21% CP. Heat production was measured in an open-circuit calorimeter, and energy, nitrogen, and fat balances were determined at regular intervals over the growing period; a total of 177 measurements were performed. Body composition of the animals was measured by serial slaughter, and these data were used for estimating the body composition of an animal at a given weight through allometric regression. A factorial analysis procedure was used to estimate the utilization of ME by regressing the ME intake on the observed protein and lipid deposition rates. The intercept of this equation is the maintenance energy requirement (MEm) and was represented either as a function of body weight with group-specific parameters (MEm = a(i) BWb) or as a function of the muscle and visceral mass with an additional additive group effect (MEm = aM muscle(b) + a(v) viscera(b) + G(i)). With BW as dependent variable, the exponent b was close to .60 and differed significantly from .75. The regression coefficient (a(i)) averaged 1.02 MJ ME/kg.60 but it was different for most groups, indicating that different groups of animals have different maintenance requirements. Fixing the exponent to .75 consistently underestimated the maintenance requirement. When the exponent b was not fixed to .75 but estimated, the partial efficiencies for protein and lipid deposition were .62 and .84, respectively. Body muscle and visceral mass could explain a large part of the variation in MEm. Viscera contributed three times more to MEm (per kilogram of mass raised to the .70 power) than did muscle. Even though the muscle mass exceeds to a large extent the visceral mass in animals, the contribution of muscle to MEm was lower than that of viscera for most groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10340588     DOI: 10.2527/1999.7751208x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  23 in total

1.  Precision feeding strategy for growing pigs under heat stress conditions.

Authors:  Luan Sousa Dos Santos; Candido Pomar; Paulo Henrique Reis Furtado Campos; Welex Candido da Silva; Jaqueline de Paula Gobi; Alini Mari Veira; Alicia Zem Fraga; Luciano Hauschild
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Interactions between sire family and production environment (temperate vs. tropical) on performance and thermoregulation responses in growing pigs.

Authors:  R Rosé; H Gilbert; T Loyau; M Giorgi; Y Billon; J Riquet; D Renaudeau; J-L Gourdine
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  A Dynamical Systems Model of Intrauterine Fetal Growth.

Authors:  Mohammad T Freigoun; Daniel E Rivera; Penghong Guo; Emily E Hohman; Alison D Gernand; Danielle Symons Downs; Jennifer S Savage
Journal:  Math Comput Model Dyn Syst       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 0.945

4.  Thermoregulatory responses during thermal acclimation in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Reis Furtado Campos; Jean Noblet; Yolande Jaguelin-Peyraud; Hélène Gilbert; Pierre Mormède; Rita Flavia Miranda de Oliveira Donzele; Juarez Lopes Donzele; David Renaudeau
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Partitioning of heat production in growing pigs as a tool to improve the determination of efficiency of energy utilization.

Authors:  Etienne Labussière; Serge Dubois; Jaap van Milgen; Jean Noblet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs.

Authors:  D Y Kil; B G Kim; H H Stein
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Daily feed intake, energy intake, growth rate and measures of dietary energy efficiency of pigs from four sire lines fed diets with high or low metabolizable and net energy concentrations.

Authors:  A P Schinckel; M E Einstein; S Jungst; J O Matthews; C Booher; T Dreadin; C Fralick; E Wilson; R D Boyd
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Characterization of dietary energy in Swine feed and feed ingredients: a review of recent research results.

Authors:  D E Velayudhan; I H Kim; C M Nyachoti
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Intestinal microbiota could transfer host Gut characteristics from pigs to mice.

Authors:  H Diao; H L Yan; Y Xiao; B Yu; J Yu; J He; P Zheng; B H Zeng; H Wei; X B Mao; D W Chen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application.

Authors:  John F Patience; Mariana C Rossoni-Serão; Néstor A Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.