Literature DB >> 10340094

The prevalence of verotoxins, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Salmonella in the feces and rumen of cattle at processing.

J Van Donkersgoed1, T Graham, V Gannon.   

Abstract

Fecal samples collected from cattle at processing during a 1-year period were tested for verotoxins (VT1, VT2), Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Salmonella. Verotoxins were detected in 42.6% (95% CI, 39.8% to 45.4%), E. coli O157:H7 in 7.5% (95% CI, 6.1% to 9.1%), and Salmonella in 0.08% (95% CI, 0.004% to 0.5%) of the fecal samples. In yearling cattle, the median within-lot prevalence (percentage of positive samples within a lot) was 40% (range, 0% to 100%) for verotoxins and 0% for E. coli O157:H7 (range, 0% to 100%) and Salmonella (range, 0% to 17%). One or more fecal samples were positive for verotoxins in 80.4% (95% CI, 72.8% to 86.4%) of the lots of yearling cattle, whereas E. coli O157:H7 were detected in 33.6% (95% CI, 26.0% to 42.0%) of the lots. In cull cows, the median within-lot prevalence was 50% (range, 0% to 100%) for verotoxins and 0% (range, 0% to 100%) for E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella (range, 0% to 0%). Verotoxins were detected in one or more fecal samples from 78.0% (95% CI, 70.4% to 84.2%) of the lots of cull cows, whereas E. coli O157:H7 were detected in only 6.0% (95% CI, 3.0% to 11.4%) of the lots of cull cows. The prevalence of verotoxins in fecal samples was lower in yearling cattle than in cull cows, whereas the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in fecal samples was higher in yearling cattle than in cull cows. The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in fecal samples was highest in the summer months. Rumen fill, body condition score, sex, type of cattle (dairy, beef), and distance travelled to the plant were not associated with the fecal prevalence of verotoxins or E. coli O157:H7. The prevalence of verotoxins in fecal samples of cull cows was associated with the source of the cattle. It was highest in cows from the auction market (52%) and farm/ranch (47%) and lowest in cows from the feedlot (31%). In rumen samples, the prevalence of verotoxins was 6.4% (95% CI, 4.2% to 9.4%), and it was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.2% to 2.3%) for E. coli O157:H7, and 0.3% (95% CI, 0.007% to 1.5%) for Salmonella.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10340094      PMCID: PMC1539799     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  20 in total

1.  Prevalence and characteristics of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 and other verotoxin-producing E. coli in healthy cattle.

Authors:  M Blanco; J E Blanco; J Blanco; E A Gonzalez; A Mora; C Prado; L Fernández; M Rio; J Ramos; M P Alonso
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Effect of some preslaughter treatments on the Salmonella population in the bovine rumen and faeces.

Authors:  F H Grau; L E Brownlie; E A Roberts
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1968-03

3.  An epidemiological study of selected calf pathogens on Holstein dairy farms in southwestern Ontario.

Authors:  D Waltner-Toews; S W Martin; A H Meek
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Distribution and characteristics of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from Ontario dairy cattle.

Authors:  J B Wilson; S A McEwen; R C Clarke; K E Leslie; R A Wilson; D Waltner-Toews; C L Gyles
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Rumen contents as a reservoir of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M A Rasmussen; W C Cray; T A Casey; S C Whipp
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Prevalence of salmonellae in cattle and in the environment on California dairies.

Authors:  B P Smith; L Da Roden; M C Thurmond; G W Dilling; H Konrad; J A Pelton; J P Picanso
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Xylose-lysine-tergitol 4: an improved selective agar medium for the isolation of Salmonella.

Authors:  R G Miller; C R Tate; E T Mallinson; J A Scherrer
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Cattle as a possible source of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 infections in man.

Authors:  P A Chapman; C A Siddons; D J Wright; P Norman; J Fox; E Crick
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.451

9.  Serum antibody responses of cattle following experimental infection with Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  R P Johnson; W C Cray; S T Johnson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  A comparison of immunomagnetic separation and direct culture for the isolation of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 from bovine faeces.

Authors:  P A Chapman; D J Wright; C A Siddons
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  33 in total

1.  Escherichia coli O157:H7 in beef cattle presented for slaughter in the U.S.: higher prevalence rates than previously estimated.

Authors:  L J Gansheroff; A D O'Brien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Non-O157 verotoxigenic Escherichia coli and beef: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Alexander Gill; Colin O Gill
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Factors associated with the presence of coliforms in the feed and water of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Michael W Sanderson; Jan M Sargeant; David G Renter; D Dee Griffin; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The use of outbreak information in the interpretation of clustering of reported cases of Escherichia coli O157 in space and time in Alberta, Canada, 2000-2002.

Authors:  D L Pearl; M Louie; L Chui; K Doré; K M Grimsrud; D Leedell; S W Martin; P Michel; L W Svenson; S A McEwen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 2.451

5.  Intestinal carriage of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, thermophilic Campylobacter and Yersinia enterocolitica, in cattle, sheep and pigs at slaughter in Great Britain during 2003.

Authors:  A S Milnes; I Stewart; F A Clifton-Hadley; R H Davies; D G Newell; A R Sayers; T Cheasty; C Cassar; A Ridley; A J C Cook; S J Evans; C J Teale; R P Smith; A McNally; M Toszeghy; R Futter; A Kay; G A Paiba
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Prevalence and characterization of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) in cattle from an Ontario abattoir.

Authors:  Musafiri Karama; Roger P Johnson; Robert Holtslander; Scott A McEwen; Carlton L Gyles
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Analyses of livestock production, waste storage, and pathogen levels and prevalences in farm manures.

Authors:  M L Hutchison; L D Walters; S M Avery; F Munro; A Moore
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effects of exogenous melatonin and tryptophan on fecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 in cattle.

Authors:  Tom S Edrington; Todd R Callaway; Dennis M Hallford; Liang Chen; Robin C Anderson; David J Nisbet
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Origin of contamination and genetic diversity of Escherichia coli in beef cattle.

Authors:  Mueen Aslam; Frances Nattress; Gordon Greer; Chris Yost; Colin Gill; Lynn McMullen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Comparison of shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli prevalences among dairy, feedlot, and cow-calf herds in Washington State.

Authors:  Rowland N Cobbold; Daniel H Rice; Maryanne Szymanski; Douglas R Call; Dale D Hancock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.