Literature DB >> 10339680

Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures.

A J Singer1, P B Richman, A Kowalska, H C Thode.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare patient and practitioner assessments of pain associated with commonly performed emergency department procedures and use of anesthetics before these procedures.
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study conducted at a university-based ED with a convenience sample of ED patients. Research assistants recorded the procedure performed and historical and demographic information on standardized data collection instruments. After each procedure, both the patient and practitioner independently recorded assessments of patient pain on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Use of preprocedure anesthetics and patient preferences regarding their use were also identified. Categorical variables were analyzed by chi(2) tests. Patient and practitioner VAS scores were compared using a paired t test; alpha was preset at .05. Correlation coefficients were calculated to assess correlation between patient and practitioner pain scores.
RESULTS: A total of 1,171 procedures were evaluated for the 15 most common procedures performed. The mean patient age was 42.8+/-18.7 years and 46.1% were male. Overall, the mean patient VAS was 20.8 mm+/-25.1 mm; the mean practitioner VAS was 23.5 mm+/-20.3 mm. The mean difference between groups was 3.0 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 4.1). Correlation between patient and practitioner pain scores for individual procedures was poor to fair (r=.26 to.68). The most painful procedures according to patients in descending order were nasogastric intubation, abscess drainage, fracture reduction, and urethral catheterization. Local anesthetics were administered in 12.8% of procedures yet would be requested before similar future procedures by 17.1% of patients. Patients who would choose local anesthetics in the future gave higher pain scores than those who would not (43.3 mm versus 16.3 mm; mean difference=27.0 mm, 95% CI, 22.2 to 31.8 mm).
CONCLUSION: The most painful procedures for ED patients were nasogastric intubation, incision and drainage of abscesses, fracture reduction, and urethral catheterization. Although practitioners also identified these procedures as most painful, the correlation between patient and practitioner pain assessments in individual patients was highly variable. Overall use of anesthetics before these procedures was low. Practitioners should be attentive to their patients' individual anesthetic needs before performing painful procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10339680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  25 in total

1.  Variation in the use of procedural sedation for incision and drainage of skin and soft tissue infection in pediatric emergency departments.

Authors:  Neil G Uspal; Eileen J Klein; Joel S Tieder; Assaf P Oron; Tamara D Simon
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Evidence-based approach to abscess management.

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  [Pain assessment in invasive diagnostic procedures. Comparison of an eleven-point numerical rating scale and a six-point verbal rating scale for pain measurement in bone marrow puncture].

Authors:  M Weber; J Schüz; J Kuball; H Gamm; J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Update on management of skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department.

Authors:  Michael S Pulia; Mary R Calderone; John R Meister; Jamie Santistevan; Larissa May
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 5.  Urinary Catheterization: a Paradigm Shift in Difficult Urinary Catheterization.

Authors:  Kristofer R Wagner; Erin T Bird; K Scott Coffield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with or without cavity packing: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Shafquat Zaman; Stephen Stonelake; Adil N Ahmad; Uttaran Datta; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Gradient-enhanced volume rendering: an image processing strategy to facilitate whole small bowel imaging with MRI.

Authors:  Michael Wyss; Johannes M Froehlich; Michael A Patak; Christoph F Juli; Markus B Scheidegger; Christoph L Zollikofer; Klaus U Wentz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A pilot study of single-use endoscopy in screening acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Jae Hee Cho; Hee Man Kim; Sangheun Lee; Yu Jin Kim; Ki Jun Han; Hyeon Geun Cho; Si Young Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  The cost-effectiveness analysis of video capsule endoscopy compared to other strategies to manage acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the ED.

Authors:  Andrew C Meltzer; Michael J Ward; Ian M Gralnek; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Value of cine MRI for better visualization of the proximal small bowel in normal individuals.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Roberto Vargas; Chikako Tanaka; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.