Literature DB >> 10339252

Cost-benefit analysis and mammographic screening: a travel cost approach.

P M Clarke1.   

Abstract

This study describes the methodology and presents preliminary results of an economic appraisal of a program to use mobile mammographic screening units in rural areas of Australia. The benefits of the project are measured using the travel cost method. Since mammograms are a 'binary good', conventional welfare analysis must be modified and discrete choice models used to estimate the demand for screening. The results suggest that the level of welfare benefits depends on the distance a town is from the nearest fixed screening unit. In the 10 towns studied, the economic benefits of mobile screening outweighed the economic costs if a rural town is situated 29 km or more from a fixed mammographic screening unit.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10339252     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00031-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  7 in total

1.  [Cost-benefit analysis in health care].

Authors:  J Puig-Junoy; J L Pinto-Prades; V Ortún-Rubio
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Willingness to pay for mammography: item development and testing among five ethnic groups.

Authors:  T H Wagner; T W Hu; G V Dueñas; R J Pasick
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Using discrete choice experiments within a cost-benefit analysis framework: some considerations.

Authors:  Emma McIntosh
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Petroleum and health care: evaluating and managing health care's vulnerability to petroleum supply shifts.

Authors:  Jeremy Hess; Daniel Bednarz; Jaeyong Bae; Jessica Pierce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Tobacco outlet density and demographics at the tract level of analysis in Iowa: implications for environmentally based prevention initiatives.

Authors:  John E Schneider; Robert J Reid; N Andrew Peterson; John B Lowe; Joseph Hughey
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-12

6.  Breast cancer screening services: trade-offs in quality, capacity, outreach, and centralization.

Authors:  Evrim D Güneş; Stephen E Chick; O Zeynep Akşin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-11

7.  Geography, private costs and uptake of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a remote rural area.

Authors:  Sandra M Lindsay; John L Duncan; John Cairns; David J Godden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.