Literature DB >> 10335302

Micromotion measurements with hip center and modular neck length alterations.

T C Doehring1, H E Rubash, D E Dore.   

Abstract

Hip center relocation often is necessary because of acetabular deformity or in revision surgery. Superolateral relocation of the acetabular component increases the hip joint reaction forces and has been associated with early femoral implant loosening. In addition, relocation can necessitate the use of extended femoral neck lengths. The purpose of this study was to compare the initial stability (micromotion) of an anatomically placed femoral component with that of a superolaterally relocated component and with a component having an extended neck length. A six-degree of freedom device was constructed to measure three-dimensional micromotion at the proximal and distal regions of the femoral component. The instrumented femur was loaded using a unique loading device that included musculature necessary to simulate stairclimbing. Results showed that superolateral relocation of the hip center (25 mm) only moderately increased femoral component micromotion (13%). However, it was found that extending the neck length 12.5 mm produced a dramatic increase in micromotion (38%). Clinically this suggests that hip center lateralization and the use of long modular neck lengths should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10335302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Cross-sectional anatomy of the ilium: implications for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John Antoniades; Vincent D Pellegrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Robert M Urban; Richard L Wixson; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA.

Authors:  Aidin Eslam Pour; Robert Borden; Takayuki Murayama; Mary Groll-Brown; J David Blaha
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions?

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Deborah J Hall; Nguyen Q Ha; Robert M Urban; Brett R Levine; Joshua J Jacobs; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Impact of acetabular reaming depth on reconstruction of rotation center in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pu Shao; Zhizhou Li; Modi Yang; Yuzhuo Wang; Te Liu; Yuhui Yang; Lian Duan; Jinlan Jiang; Jianlin Zuo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Analysis of the Risk of Wear on Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liners According to Different Variables in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre; Loreto Barrios; Juan De la Torre-Mosquera; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega; Carlos González-Bravo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Can porous tantalum acetabular cups and augments restore the hip centre of rotation in revision hip arthroplasty? Long-term results.

Authors:  Chiara Concina; Marina Crucil; Franco Gherlinzoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.