Literature DB >> 10334971

Predicting composition of leg sections with anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis, using magnetic resonance imaging as reference.

N J Fuller1, C R Hardingham, M Graves, N Screaton, A K Dixon, L C Ward, M Elia.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate and compare with anthropometry a fundamental bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method for predicting muscle and adipose tissue composition in the lower limb. Healthy volunteers (eight men and eight women), aged 41 to 62 years, with mean (S.D.) body mass indices of 28.6 (5.4) kg/m2 and 25.1 (5.4) kg/m2 respectively, were subjected to MRI leg scans, from which 20-cm sections of thigh and 10-cm sections of lower leg (calf) were analysed for muscle and adipose tissue content, using specifically developed software. Muscle and adipose tissue were also predicted from anthropometric measurements of circumferences and skinfold thicknesses, and by use of fundamental BIA equations involving section impedance at 50 kHz and tissue-specific resistivities. Anthropometric assessments of circumferences, cross-sectional areas and volumes for total constituent tissues matched closely MRI estimates. Muscle volume was substantially overestimated (bias: thigh, -40%; calf, -18%) and adipose tissue underestimated (bias: thigh, 43%; calf, 8%) by anthropometry, in contrast to generally better predictions by the fundamental BIA approach for muscle (bias: thigh, -12%; calf, 5%) and adipose tissue (bias: thigh, 17%; calf, -28%). However, both methods demonstrated considerable individual variability (95% limits of agreement 20-77%). In general, there was similar reproducibility for anthropometric and fundamental BIA methods in the thigh (inter-observer residual coefficient of variation for muscle 3.5% versus 3.8%), but the latter was better in the calf (inter-observer residual coefficient of variation for muscle 8.2% versus 4.5%). This study suggests that the fundamental BIA method has advantages over anthropometry for measuring lower limb tissue composition in healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10334971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  21 in total

1.  The accuracy of volume estimates using ultrasound muscle thickness measurements in different muscle groups.

Authors:  Masae Miyatani; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Masamitsu Ito; Yasuo Kawakami; Tetsuo Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  How do sock ply changes affect residual-limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Katheryn J Allyn; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol; Elaine C Tsai
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

3.  How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

4.  The validity of anthropometric leg muscle volume estimation across a wide spectrum: from able-bodied adults to individuals with a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Gwenael Layec; Massimo Venturelli; Eun-Kee Jeong; Russell S Richardson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-01-23

5.  Effects of elevated vacuum on in-socket residual limb fluid volume: case study results using bioimpedance analysis.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

6.  Estimation of maximal oxygen uptake by bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Stahn; Elmarie Terblanche; Sven Grunert; Günther Strobel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Impact of skin-subcutaneous fat layer thickness on electrical impedance myography measurements: an initial assessment.

Authors:  A W Tarulli; A B Chin; K S Lee; S B Rutkove
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Sarcopenia: clinical evaluation, biological markers and other evaluation tools.

Authors:  M Pahor; T Manini; M Cesari
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  Variants within the MMP3 gene and patellar tendon properties in vivo in an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Brandon Paul Foster; Christopher I Morse; Gladys L Onambele; Alun G Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Human COL5A1 rs12722 gene polymorphism and tendon properties in vivo in an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Brandon Paul Foster; Christopher I Morse; Gladys L Onambele; Alun G Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.