OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to determine risk factor clusters predicting type 2 diabetes in subjects with and without family history of diabetes by applying factor analyses. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 309 siblings of diabetic (DM+) or nondiabetic (DM-) probands. Risk factors, including lipids, lipoproteins, blood pressure, and glucose tolerance status, were measured at the baseline study and 8 years later. RESULTS: Siblings in the DM+ group had a significantly higher risk of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 3.25; P = 0.002) than siblings in the DM- group. Altogether, factor analyses revealed four significant factors in both the DM+ and DM- groups (the percentage of cumulative variance explained 62-66%). Of these, factor 1 (percentage of variance, 27-29%) was characterized by high loadings for BMI, hypertension, glucose area, insulin area (the highest loading), and triglycerides in both the DM+ and DM- groups; therefore, factor 1 can be interpreted as a hyperinsulinemia factor. Also, other factors were essentially similar in both groups. Hyperinsulinemia factor was similarly associated with the risk of developing diabetes in the DM+ group (OR = 4.33, 95% CI 2.29-8.19; P < 0.001) and the DM- group (OR = 4.22, 95% CI 2.02-8.81; P < 0.001) in logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors around hyperinsulinemia is an important predictor of diabetes in 8-year follow-up independent of family history of diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to determine risk factor clusters predicting type 2 diabetes in subjects with and without family history of diabetes by applying factor analyses. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 309 siblings of diabetic (DM+) or nondiabetic (DM-) probands. Risk factors, including lipids, lipoproteins, blood pressure, and glucose tolerance status, were measured at the baseline study and 8 years later. RESULTS: Siblings in the DM+ group had a significantly higher risk of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 3.25; P = 0.002) than siblings in the DM- group. Altogether, factor analyses revealed four significant factors in both the DM+ and DM- groups (the percentage of cumulative variance explained 62-66%). Of these, factor 1 (percentage of variance, 27-29%) was characterized by high loadings for BMI, hypertension, glucose area, insulin area (the highest loading), and triglycerides in both the DM+ and DM- groups; therefore, factor 1 can be interpreted as a hyperinsulinemia factor. Also, other factors were essentially similar in both groups. Hyperinsulinemia factor was similarly associated with the risk of developing diabetes in the DM+ group (OR = 4.33, 95% CI 2.29-8.19; P < 0.001) and the DM- group (OR = 4.22, 95% CI 2.02-8.81; P < 0.001) in logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors around hyperinsulinemia is an important predictor of diabetes in 8-year follow-up independent of family history of diabetes.
Authors: T A Hillier; A Rousseau; C Lange; P Lépinay; M Cailleau; M Novak; E Calliez; P Ducimetière; B Balkau Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Matthew P Buman; Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Glenn A Gaesser; Noe C Crespo; Peter Hannan; Linda Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Mark A Pereira Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Ching-Yu Cheng; Kristine E Lee; Priya Duggal; Emily L Moore; Alexander F Wilson; Ronald Klein; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Barbara E K Klein Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Claudia H T Tam; Vincent K L Lam; Wing-Yee So; Ronald C W Ma; Juliana C N Chan; Maggie C Y Ng Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 2.797
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Joyce T Bromberger; Melissa D Latham; Nancy E Adler; Lauri A Pasch; Steven E Gregorich; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.953