AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We devised a practical continuous score to assess the metabolic syndrome, and assessed whether this syndrome score predicts incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Among 5,024 participants of the Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (D.E.S.I.R.) cohort, we defined a metabolic syndrome score by the first principal component (PC1), using only the correlations between continuous metabolic syndrome measures (glucose, waist circumference, triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure). This metabolic syndrome score was highly correlated with a similar score also including insulin and HDL cholesterol (r ( s )=0.94). Over 9 years of follow-up, incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were predicted by logistic regression using the simpler metabolic syndrome score. RESULTS: The means of the metabolic syndrome measures differed between men and women. Nevertheless, as the degree of variance explained and the PC1 coefficients were remarkably similar, we used a common metabolic syndrome score. The metabolic syndrome score explained 50% of the variance of the metabolic syndrome measures, and waist circumference had the highest correlation (0.59) with this score. Each standard deviation increase in the metabolic syndrome score was associated with a markedly increased age-adjusted risk of developing diabetes (odds ratios: men 3.4 [95% CI 2.6-4.4]; women 5.1 [3.6-7.2]) and with increased incident CVD of 1.7 (1.4-2.1) in men and 1.7 (1.0-2.7) in women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our results, which should be confirmed in other populations, suggest that it is possible to evaluate the risk of the metabolic syndrome in a pragmatic fashion with a continuous score, obtained from principal components analysis of the basic, continuous syndrome measures.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We devised a practical continuous score to assess the metabolic syndrome, and assessed whether this syndrome score predicts incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Among 5,024 participants of the Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (D.E.S.I.R.) cohort, we defined a metabolic syndrome score by the first principal component (PC1), using only the correlations between continuous metabolic syndrome measures (glucose, waist circumference, triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure). This metabolic syndrome score was highly correlated with a similar score also including insulin and HDL cholesterol (r ( s )=0.94). Over 9 years of follow-up, incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were predicted by logistic regression using the simpler metabolic syndrome score. RESULTS: The means of the metabolic syndrome measures differed between men and women. Nevertheless, as the degree of variance explained and the PC1 coefficients were remarkably similar, we used a common metabolic syndrome score. The metabolic syndrome score explained 50% of the variance of the metabolic syndrome measures, and waist circumference had the highest correlation (0.59) with this score. Each standard deviation increase in the metabolic syndrome score was associated with a markedly increased age-adjusted risk of developing diabetes (odds ratios: men 3.4 [95% CI 2.6-4.4]; women 5.1 [3.6-7.2]) and with increased incident CVD of 1.7 (1.4-2.1) in men and 1.7 (1.0-2.7) in women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Our results, which should be confirmed in other populations, suggest that it is possible to evaluate the risk of the metabolic syndrome in a pragmatic fashion with a continuous score, obtained from principal components analysis of the basic, continuous syndrome measures.
Authors: Weihong Tang; Michael B Miller; Stephen S Rich; Kari E North; James S Pankow; Ingrid B Borecki; Richard H Myers; Paul N Hopkins; Mark Leppert; Donna K Arnett Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Saul Genuth; K G M M Alberti; Peter Bennett; John Buse; Ralph Defronzo; Richard Kahn; John Kitzmiller; William C Knowler; Harold Lebovitz; Ake Lernmark; David Nathan; Jerry Palmer; Robert Rizza; Christopher Saudek; Jonathan Shaw; Michael Steffes; Michael Stern; Jaako Tuomilehto; Paul Zimmet Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; Stephen R Daniels; Karen A Donato; Robert H Eckel; Barry A Franklin; David J Gordon; Ronald M Krauss; Peter J Savage; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Fernando Costa Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lynn E Eberly; Ronald Prineas; Jerome D Cohen; Gabriela Vazquez; Xin Zhi; James D Neaton; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jacqueline M Dekker; Cynthia Girman; Thomas Rhodes; Giel Nijpels; Coen D A Stehouwer; Lex M Bouter; Robert J Heine Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-08-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Khursheed Jeejeebhoy; Rupinder Dhaliwal; Daren K Heyland; Roger Leung; Andrew G Day; Paula Brauer; Dawna Royall; Angelo Tremblay; David M Mutch; Lew Pliamm; Caroline Rhéaume; Doug Klein Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2017-03-14
Authors: Sindre Lee; Frode Norheim; Torgrim M Langleite; Hanne L Gulseth; Kåre I Birkeland; Christian A Drevon Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Matthew P Buman; Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Glenn A Gaesser; Noe C Crespo; Peter Hannan; Linda Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Mark A Pereira Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Anna Viitasalo; Timo A Lakka; David E Laaksonen; Kai Savonen; Hanna-Maaria Lakka; Maija Hassinen; Pirjo Komulainen; Tuomo Tompuri; Sudhir Kurl; Jari A Laukkanen; Rainer Rauramaa Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Joyce T Bromberger; Melissa D Latham; Nancy E Adler; Lauri A Pasch; Steven E Gregorich; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Abigail J S Armstrong; Kevin Quinn; Jennifer Fouquier; Sam X Li; Jennifer M Schneider; Nichole M Nusbacher; Katrina A Doenges; Suzanne Fiorillo; Tyson J Marden; Janine Higgins; Nichole Reisdorph; Thomas B Campbell; Brent E Palmer; Catherine A Lozupone Journal: mSystems Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 6.496
Authors: Khalid M Alkharfy; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Paul M Vanhoutte; Soundararajan Krishnaswamy; Aimin Xu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240