Literature DB >> 10333020

Quality of computer enhanced totally endoscopic coronary bypass graft anastomosis--comparison to conventional technique.

V Falk1, J F Gummert, T Walther, M Hayase, G J Berry, F W Mohr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aims of the study were to develop an endoscopic technique to perform robot assisted coronary anastomoses, using a computer enhanced telemanipulator and to compare the quality of the anastomoses with those performed using a standard open technique.
METHODS: A surgical telemanipulator with two instrument arms and a central videoscopic arm was used to perform remote endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on isolated porcine hearts. The end effectors and the videoscope were placed through three 10 mm port incisions. All anastomoses (Cx to LAD) were performed using a double armed 7-0 Prolene suture of 5 or 7 cm in length. All operations were performed remotely from the master console using ten times magnification, tremor filtering and 3:1 motion scaling. Initially 20 anastomoses were performed to develop and train the technique. Then, 20 robot-assisted anastomoses (group I) were compared with 20 anastomoses using a standard open parachute technique (group II). All anastomoses were checked for patency and leakage. Patency was confirmed by bench angiography. After fixation, all anastomoses were macroscopically evaluated for patency, intactness, alignment, intimal tears and dehiscence. Both angiographic and pathologic evaluations were performed with the examiners blinded to the technique of anastomosis.
RESULTS: In the initial feasibility series, time for anastomosis was 18.2 +/- 9.1 min. All anastomoses were patent although minor stenoses were found in two and minor leakage was noted in five anastomoses. In the second series all anastomoses were patent, not leaking and showed a good run-off at angiography. Mean time for anastomosis in group I was 12.8 +/- 2.4 min as compared with 6.3 +/- 0.2 min in group II (P < 0.001), respectively. Macroscopic analysis demonstrated equal quality for both groups. There were no stenoses, no intimal tears and no dehiscences. All anastomoses had a normal alignment and intact suture lines.
CONCLUSION: Using the Intuitive surgical telemanipulator, it is possible to remotely perform endoscopic coronary anastomoses with the same quality as with an open standard technique after a brief learning curve. This will enable true endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with a precision that has not been achieved with any other previously applied endoscopic technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10333020     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00008-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

1.  [Mechatronic in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. First experiences with the daVinci Telemanipulatory System].

Authors:  G Strauss; D Winkler; S Jacobs; C Trantakis; A Dietz; F Bootz; J Meixensberger; V Falk
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills.

Authors:  F H Halvorsen; O J Elle; V V Dalinin; B E Mørk; V Sørhus; J S Røtnes; E Fosse
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic intragastric surgery: a new surgical approach for the gastric lesion.

Authors:  Yasumitsu Hirano; Norihiko Ishikawa; Kenji Omura; Noriyuki Inaki; Chikashi Hiranuma; Ryuichi Waseda; Go Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The effect of a silicone-coated robotic needle holder.

Authors:  Norihiko Ishikawa; Go Watanabe; Yasumitsu Hirano; Hideki Moriyama; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-07-19

5.  Parachute technique for portal vein reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection in patients with pancreatic head cancer.

Authors:  Shoichi Irie; Ryuji Yoshioka; Hiroshi Imamura; Yoshihiro Ono; Takafumi Sato; Yosuke Inoue; Hiromichi Ito; Yoshihiro Mise; Yu Takahashi; Akio Saiura
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Do manual assisting maneuvers increase speed and technical performance in robotically sutured coronary bypass graft anastomoses?

Authors:  J Bonatti; J Alfadlhi; T Schachner; N Bonaros; E Rützler; G Laufer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Totally endoscopic robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass on the beating heart.

Authors:  Roberto P Casula; Thanos Athanasiou; Ashok Cherian; Ross Bacon; Rodney Foale; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  Robotically assisted endoscopic ovarian transposition.

Authors:  Kelly L Molpus; June S Wedergren; Mark A Carlson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Yugal K Mishra; H Wasir; Malhotra Rajneesh; K K Sharma; Y Mehta; N Trehan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2007-07-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.