Literature DB >> 10332242

Microbiological findings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases selected for microbiological investigation.

E K Siren1, M P Haapasalo, K Ranta, P Salmi, E N Kerosuo.   

Abstract

The relationship between bacteriological findings and clinical treatment procedures was investigated in root canal treatment cases that were selected for bacteriological investigation by general dental practitioners in Finland. The cultures were sent to the Oral Microbiological Service Laboratory at the Institute of Dentistry in Helsinki. Two groups of teeth were selected based on the type of infection present in the root canal system. The 'enteric bacteria' group consisted of 40 sequential cases where Enterococcus faecalis and/or other facultative enteric bacteria or Pseudomonas sp. were found in the samples in pure culture (35%) or together with other types of bacteria. The group 'non-enteric bacteria' consisted of 40 sequential cases where only non-enteric bacteria were found. The dentists who had sent the bacteriological samples received a questionnaire where they were asked about the treatment protocol and procedures. A total of 70 out of 80 questionnaires were returned. If the root canals had been unsealed at some point during the treatment, enteric bacteria were found more frequently than in canals with an adequate seal between the appointments. Of cases with enteric bacteria 55% had been open during the treatment, while in the group where only non-enteric bacteria were found 30% had been open. Enteric bacteria were also more frequently isolated in cases with a high number of appointments before sampling. In the enteric bacteria group 35% of the samples were taken at the 10th visit or later, while the corresponding percentage in the non-enteric group was 3%. In addition, the number of retreatment cases was significantly higher, 12 out of 34, in the enteric bacteria group than in non-enteric bacteria group, which was five out of 36. Other clinical parameters showed no differences between the two groups. The results emphasize the importance of controlled asepsis throughout the root canal treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10332242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  36 in total

1.  Molecular identification of microorganisms from endodontic infections.

Authors:  H J Rolph; A Lennon; M P Riggio; W P Saunders; D MacKenzie; L Coldero; J Bagg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Incidence of three roots and/or four root canals in the permanent mandibular first molars in a Korean sub-population.

Authors:  Ju-Kyong Jang; Ove A Peters; Woocheol Lee; Sung-Ae Son; Jeong-Kil Park; Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Contamination of gutta-percha and Resilon cones taken directly from the manufacturer.

Authors:  Osvaldo L Seabra Pereira; José F Siqueira
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Study comparing the effectiveness of chlorhexidine, calcium hydroxide and linezolid based medicaments against enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Rajdeep Pavaskar; Paul Chalakkal; Ramesh Krishnan; Saritha Sirikonda; Madhu Vasepalli; Pammi Venkataramana
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 5.  Etiological findings in endodontic-periodontal infections.

Authors:  Amela Lacević; Edina Vranić; Irfan Zulić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.363

6.  PCR-based identification of bacteria associated with endodontic infections.

Authors:  Ashraf F Fouad; Jody Barry; Melissa Caimano; Michael Clawson; Qiang Zhu; Rachaele Carver; Karsten Hazlett; Justin D Radolf
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Effect of a genetically engineered bacteriophage on Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.

Authors:  Justine Monnerat Tinoco; Bettina Buttaro; Hongming Zhang; Nadia Liss; Luciana Sassone; Roy Stevens
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Alexidine: a Safer and an Effective Root Canal Irrigant than Chlorhexidine.

Authors:  L R Surender; A Shikha; A Swathi; C Manaswini; Aisha Habeeb; S Shashi Prabha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-07-01

9.  In vitro scanning electron microscopic study on the effect of doxycycline and vancomycin on enterococcal induced biofilm.

Authors:  Krishnaraj Somayaji; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Indira Bairy; Peralam Yegneswaran Prakash; Muddanna Sakkattu Rao; Nidambur Vasudev Ballal
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2010-05-20

10.  Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection.

Authors:  Hyun-Shik Kim; Seok Woo Chang; Seung-Ho Baek; Seung Hyun Han; Yoon Lee; Qiang Zhu; Kee-Yeon Kum
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 6.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.