| Literature DB >> 10330439 |
C Robin1, F Pflumio, W Vainchenker, L Coulombel.
Abstract
Transplantation of genetically marked donor cells in mice have unambiguously identified individual clones with full differentiative potential in all lymphoid and myeloid pathways. Such evidence has been lacking in humans because of limitations inherent to clonal stem cell assays. In this work, we used single cell cultures to show that human cord blood (CB) contains totipotent CD34(+) cells capable of T, B, natural killer, and granulocytic cell differentiation. Single CD34(+) CD19(-)Thy1(+) (or CD38(-)) cells from fresh CB were first induced to proliferate and their progeny separately studied in mouse fetal thymic organotypic cultures (FTOCs) and cocultures on murine stromal feeder layers. 10% of the clones individually analyzed produced CD19(+), CD56(+), and CD15(+) cells in stromal cocultures and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells in FTOCs, identifying totipotent progenitor cells. Furthermore, we showed that totipotent clones with similar lymphomyeloid potential are detected in the bone marrow of nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient (NOD-SCID) mice transplanted 4 mo earlier with human CB CD34(+) cells. These results provide the first direct demonstration that human CB contains totipotent lymphomyeloid progenitors and transplantable CD34(+) cells with the ability to reconstitute, in the marrow of recipient mice, the hierarchy of hematopoietic compartments, including a compartment of functional totipotent cells. These experimental approaches can now be exploited to analyze mechanisms controlling the decisions of such primitive human progenitors and to design conditions for their ampification that can be helpful for therapeutic purposes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10330439 PMCID: PMC2193640 DOI: 10.1084/jem.189.10.1601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Med ISSN: 0022-1007 Impact factor: 14.307
Figure 1Selection of human cell populations. Human CD34+ cells purified from fresh CB (A and B) and NOD-SCID marrow (C, D, and E) were first depleted of CD19+ cells (A and C). CD34+CD19− cells were further enriched for Thy1+ cells (B and D) or CD38− cells (E). Gates selected for cell sorting are indicated in B (CD34+CD19−Thy1+), D (CD34+ CD19−Thy1+), and E (CD34+CD19−CD38−). Limits of the quadrants were determined by analyzing cells labeled with isotype-control Ig.
Phenotype of Human Cells Grown from CD34+CD19−, CD34+CD19−Thy1+, and CD34+CD19−CD38− Cells from Fresh CB and NOD-SCID Mice
| Cell fraction | No. of experiments | Cytokines | Time in culture | Proportion of cells in the gate | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD19+ | CD56+ | CD15+ | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Fresh CB | ||||||||||||
| CD34+CD19− | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0.3; 0.2 | 1.4; 5 | 24; 36 | ||||||
| 1 | 6 | 3 | 0.4 | 45 | 34 | |||||||
| CD34+CD19−Thy1+ | 2 | 3 | 2-3 | 5.7 ± 1.1 | 10 ± 6 | 24 ± 6 | ||||||
| NOD-SCID mice | ||||||||||||
| CD34+CD19− | 4 | 3 | 2 | 19 ± 6.4 | 44 ± 15 | 6 ± 1 | ||||||
| 4 | 6 | 3 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 9.5 ± 4.1 | 22 ± 13 | |||||||
| CD34+CD19−Thy1+ | 3 | 6 | 4-6 | 6.4 ± 6 | 47 ± 9 | 20 ± 5 | ||||||
| CD34+CD19−CD38− | 3 | 6 | 4-6 | 1 ± 0.4 | 44 ± 3 | 28 ± 5 | ||||||
Cytokines, 3 = IL-2, IL-15, and SCF; 6 = IL-2, IL-15, SCF, PEG-rhu-MGDF, Flt3-L, and IL-7.
The proportions of cells are calculated in the morphological gate indicated on Fig. 2 A. SEM was calculated if >2 experiments were available. Otherwise, results for individual experiments are indicated.
Figure 2Assessment of the Gr/M and lymphoid potentials of human CD34+CD19− cells from the marrow of NOD-SCID mice transplanted with CB CD34+ cells. 10,000 human CD34+CD19− cells obtained from the marrow of NOD-SCID mice 4 mo after transplantation with 105 human CB CD34+ cells were cultured on MS5 cells with six cytokines (A–C) or in chimeric FTOC (D–G). Cells cultured on MS5 were stained with CD15-FITC, CD19-PE, and CD56-PE-Cy5, and cells grown in FTOC were stained with CD4-PE and CD8-FITC. In F and G, cells were analyzed after three-color labeling (CD3-FITC, TCR-α/β-PE, and CD4-PE-Cy5). Labeled cells were analyzed on a FACScan™ (CellQuest software) in the morphological gates indicated in A and D, which included all viable nucleated cells. Positivity set by the quadrant limits was defined using isotype-control Ig. These results are from one representative experiment in which FTOCs and stromal cultures were initiated with human cells purified from NOD-SCID mice.
Lymphoid (B, NK) and Granulocytic Potentials of Single CD34+ Cells from Fresh CB and NOD-SCID Mice
| CD34+ fractions | No. of wells | No. of wells with cells of the indicated lineage | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| one lineage | two lineages | three lineages | ||||||||||||||||||||
| NK | B | M | Total % | NK/B | NK/M | B/M | Total % | NK/B/M | Total % | |||||||||||||
| Fresh CB | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CD19− | 180/55 | 8 | 2 | 20 | 54 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 9 | 16 | |||||||||||
| CD19−Thy1+ | 120/28 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 8 | 28 | |||||||||||
| NOD-SCID mice | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CD19− | 600/90 | 40 | 1 | 21 | 69 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 23 | 8 | 9 | |||||||||||
| CD19−Thy1+ | 120/30 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 53 | 10 | 33 | |||||||||||
| CD19−CD38− | 120/34 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 62 | 5 | 15 | |||||||||||
M, CD15+ cells.
Numbers refer to the ratio of the total no. of wells initiated/no. of wells analyzed.
Proportions were calculated as the ratio of clones containing one, two, or three lineages per total no. of clones analyzed.
Analysis of the Progeny of Single CD34+CD19− or CD34+CD19−Thy1+ or CD34+CD19−CD38− Subpopulations from Fresh CB and NOD-SCID Mice
| CD34+CD19− fractions | No. of wells | No. of wells with cells of the indicated phenotype | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| one lineage | two lineages | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NK | M | T | Total % | NK/B | NK/M | B/M | M/T | NK/T | Total % | |||||||||||||
| Fresh CB Thy1+
| 420/150 | 30 | 16 | 3 | 33 | 25 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 31 | |||||||||||
| NOD-SCID mice Thy1+
| 240/76 | 29 | 15 | 0 | 58 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 30 | |||||||||||
| CD38− | 240/92 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 34 | |||||||||||
| CD34+CD19− fractions | No. of wells | three lineages | four lineages | |||||||||||||||||||
| NK/B/M | M/B/T | NK/M/T | NK/B/T | Total % | NK/B/T/M | Total % | ||||||||||||||||
| Fresh CB Thy1+
| 420/150 | 31 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 30 | 10 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| NOD-SCID mice Thy1+
| 240/76 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||
| CD38− | 240/92 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 29 | 13 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
M, CD15+ cells.
Numbers refer to the total no. of wells initiated/no. of wells analyzed.
Proportions were calculated as the ratio of clones containing one, two, three, or four lineages per total no. of clones analyzed.
Figure 3Production of T, B, NK, and Gr/M cells by single CD34+CD19−CD38− cells from the marrow of NOD-SCID mice transplanted with CB CD34+ cells. Analysis of the progeny of four individual clones is shown (A–D). Single CD34+CD19CD38− cells were cultured on MS5 with a cocktail of six cytokines during 2 wk and the progeny separated to initiate secondary MS5 cocultures and FTOC. Cells were cultured for another 2 wk with MS5 and cytokines and an additional 4 wk in FTOC, after which time they were labeled with lineage-specific antibodies as described in the Fig. 2 legend. Analysis was performed in the gates defined in Fig. 2, A and D.
Figure 4Combinations of cells from different lineages produced by single CD34+CD19−CD38− cells from CB or from the marrow of NOD-SCID mice transplanted with CB CD34+ cells. Single cells from fresh CB (A) and NOD-SCID bone marrow (B, C, and D) were cultured and their progeny analyzed as described for Fig. 3. The progeny of four clones with different differentiative capacities is shown: clone A (A) contained B, NK and T cells; clone B (B) contained B and NK cells; clone C (C) contained NK and T cells, and clone D (D) contained Gr/M cells and NK cells. Analysis was performed in the gates defined in Fig. 2, A and D.