Literature DB >> 10328472

Donor age and delayed graft function as predictors of renal allograft survival in rejection-free patients.

F Moreso1, D Serón, S Gil-Vernet, L Riera, X Fulladosa, R Ramos, J Alsina, J M Grinyó.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients of kidneys harvested from old donors have a high incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and a poor graft outcome. This result is partly explained by the increased incidence of acute rejection in patients suffering from DGF. However, the long-term impact of donor age and DGF in rejection free renal transplants is not well established. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the impact of donor age and DGF on long-term outcome in renal transplants with or without acute rejection. PATIENTS: We review all cadaveric kidney transplants performed in our centre between April 1984 and December 1995 treated with a cyclosporin-based immunosuppression.
RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-five patients were included. The overall incidence of DGF was 29.1%, and this event was associated with an increased donor age and cold ischaemia time. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that graft loss was associated with acute rejection (relative risk (RR) 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-3.01); DGF (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.32-2.54); donors >50 years (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.38); and retransplantation (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.31). In rejection-free patients there were two independent predictors of graft failure: donor >50 years (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.45-4.01); and DGF (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.53-3.84).
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the presence of acute rejection, delayed graft function amplifies the detrimental effect of advanced donor age on long-term graft outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10328472     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/14.4.930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  26 in total

Review 1.  Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sri G Yarlagadda; Steven G Coca; Amit X Garg; Mona Doshi; Emilio Poggio; Richard J Marcus; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Delayed graft function and the risk of acute rejection in the modern era of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  W Kelly Wu; Olusegun Famure; Yanhong Li; S Joseph Kim
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Evaluating the effects of extended cold ischemia on interstitial metabolite in grafts in kidney transplantation using microdialysis.

Authors:  Hamidreza Fonouni; Parvin Jarahian; Morva Tahmasbi Rad; Mohammad Golriz; Alireza Faridar; Majid Esmaeilzadeh; Mohammadreza Hafezi; Stephan Macher-Goeppinger; Thomas Longerich; Berk Orakcioglu; Oliver W Sakowitz; Camelia Garoussi; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Kidney Transplant With Low Levels of DSA or Low Positive B-Flow Crossmatch: An Underappreciated Option for Highly Sensitized Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Carrie A Schinstock; Manish Gandhi; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Donald Mitema; Mikel Prieto; Patrick Dean; Lynn Cornell; Fernando Cosio; Mark Stegall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Organ donation after death in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Frank Markel; Damon C Scales
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The impact of age on rejection in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Johan W de Fijter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Donor age and renal P-glycoprotein expression associate with chronic histological damage in renal allografts.

Authors:  Maarten Naesens; Evelyne Lerut; Hylke de Jonge; Boudewijn Van Damme; Yves Vanrenterghem; Dirk R J Kuypers
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  "Nature versus nurture" study of deceased-donor pairs in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel W Louvar; Na Li; Jon Snyder; Yi Peng; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Is delayed graft function causally associated with long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation? Instrumental variable analysis.

Authors:  Neel M Butala; Peter P Reese; Mona D Doshi; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Similar outcomes with different rates of delayed graft function may reflect center practice, not center performance.

Authors:  S K Akkina; J J Connaire; A K Israni; J J Snyder; A J Matas; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.