Literature DB >> 10326734

Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength.

T Yoshikawa1, H Sano, M F Burrow, J Tagami, D H Pashley.   

Abstract

During polymerization of resin composites, shrinkage stresses compete with resin-dentin bonds in a manner that can cause failure of the bond, depending upon the configuration of the cavity, its depth, and the restorative technique. The hypothesis tested in this study was that the effect of cavity configuration (C) and remaining dentin thickness (RDT) influence resin bond strength to the dentin of Class I cavity floors. The occlusal enamel was ground to expose a flat superficial dentin surface as a control (superficial dentin, C-factor = 1) in human extracted third molars. Cavities 3 mm long x 4 mm wide were prepared to a depth 2 mm below the ground dentin surfaces (deep dentin within cavity floor, C-factor = 3). To assess the relationship between C-factor and RDT, we removed the walls of cavities, making a deep flat surface for bonding (deep dentin, C-factor = 1). The teeth were restored with either Clearfil Liner Bond II (LB II), One-Step (OS), or Super-Bond D Liner (DL), followed by Clearfil Photo Posterior resin composite. After 24 hrs' storage in water, the teeth were sectioned vertically into 3 or 4 slabs (0.7 mm thick) and trimmed for the micro-tensile bond test so that we could determine the strength of the resin bonds to the pulpal floor. All groups gave high bond strengths to superficial dentin, but OS and DL gave significantly lower bond strengths to flat deep dentin when the C-factor was 1. When the C-factor was increased to 3 by the creation of a three-dimensional cavity preparation, the bond strengths of all materials fell (range, 21 to 35%), but the difference was significant (p < 0.05) only with DL. SEM observations of failure patterns showed that specimens with high bond strengths tended to exhibit cohesive failures within the hybrid layer, while specimens exhibiting low bond strengths showed failures at the top of the hybrid layer. Some adhesives do not bond well to deep dentin, making them more susceptible to polymerization shrinkage stress that develops in cavities with high C-factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10326734     DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780041001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  22 in total

1.  In vitro microtensile bond strength of four adhesives tested at the gingival and pulpal walls of Class II restorations.

Authors:  John H Purk; Matthew Healy; Vladimir Dusevich; Alan Glaros; J David Eick
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Retention of Tooth Coloured and Stainless Steel Endodontic Posts: An In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Kiran Keswani; Rahul Maria; Rohit Punga
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

3.  Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations.

Authors:  Alessandro Vichi; Mariam Margvelashvili; Cecilia Goracci; Federica Papacchini; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive mod cavities.

Authors:  M Zaruba; R Kasper; R Kazama; F J Wegehaupt; A Ender; T Attin; A Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of Effect of C-Factor on Bond Strength to Human Dentin Using Different Composite Resin Materials.

Authors:  Thakur Veerandar Singh; Jaya Prakash Patil; Rvs Chakradhar Raju; Bhuvan Shome Venigalla; S V Jyotsna; Neha Bhutani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 6.  Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Ricardo M Carvalho; Adriana P Manso; Saulo Geraldeli; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  The nano-hardness and elastic modulus of sound deciduous canine dentin and young premolar dentin--preliminary study.

Authors:  Y Hosoya; G W Marshall
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Marginal permeability of one step self-etch adhesives: Effects of double application or the application of hydrophobic layer.

Authors:  R Pushpa; B S Suresh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-07

9.  'Split posterior tooth': conservative clinical re-attachment.

Authors:  Sathish Abraham; Lisa Neelathil Chacko
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-30

10.  Effect of collagen cross-linkers on the shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive system to deep dentin.

Authors:  Sakhamuri Srinivasulu; Sampath Vidhya; Manimaran Sujatha; Sekar Mahalaxmi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.