Literature DB >> 10325762

Four key questions that identify severe disability.

J Fooks1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Six hundred and four surviving children aged 2 years, who had been entered into a neonatal trial of fresh frozen plasma on the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage, were grouped into four categories of disability based on a review by a full paediatric assessment. A 29 item questionnaire completed by the children's health visitors was used to group the children into the same categories. AIMS: To explore whether severe disability could be identified by using only a few of the 29 questions.
METHOD: The sensitivity and specificity of individual questions were used first to find the subset of questions that best identified children with severe disability. The efficacy of the four most useful questions was tested in a separate cohort of 105 children for whom health visitors had completed questionnaires at the age of 2 years, and who had similarly been assessed by a paediatrician.
RESULTS: In the original trial cohort, the four questions correctly identified 56 of the 61 children with the most severe disabilities as assessed by the paediatrician, and seven children were falsely identified as being severely disabled. In the second cohort, the four questions correctly identified six of the seven children classified as severely disabled by the paediatrician, with no false positives.
CONCLUSION: If four such questions were included in routine child information systems at age 2 years, it might be possible to obtain useful data on the prevalence of severe disability in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10325762      PMCID: PMC1717806          DOI: 10.1136/adc.80.1.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  5 in total

1.  Potential value of four early developmental milestones in screening children for increased risk of later retardation.

Authors:  G Neligan; D Prudham
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  Is late walking a marker of morbidity? Steering Committee, Oxford Region Child Development Project.

Authors:  A Johnson; O Goddard; H Ashurst
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Validity of the 'Ten Questions' for screening serious childhood disability: results from urban Bangladesh.

Authors:  S S Zaman; N Z Khan; S Islam; S Banu; S Dixit; P Shrout; M Durkin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  A comparison of two methods of follow-up in a trial of prophylactic volume expansion in preterm babies.

Authors:  J Fooks; S Fritz; W Tin; P Yudkin; A Johnson; D Elbourne; E Hey
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.980

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments.

Authors:  A R O'Connor; T J Stephenson; A Johnson; S D Wright; M J Tobin; S Ratib; A R Fielder
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants from the Vermont Oxford network: 1998-2003.

Authors:  Charles E Mercier; Michael S Dunn; Karla R Ferrelli; Diantha B Howard; Roger F Soll
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  The Magpie Trial follow up study: outcome after discharge from hospital for women and children recruited to a trial comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo for pre-eclampsia [ISRCTN86938761].

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.