Literature DB >> 15321859

A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments.

A R O'Connor1, T J Stephenson, A Johnson, S D Wright, M J Tobin, S Ratib, A R Fielder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are important tools used to gain information about health and level of function in different domains. AIMS AND METHODS: To determine the degree of agreement between questionnaires, administered to parents and teachers, and ophthalmic and psychological examinations in a cohort of 309 low birth weight children (<1701 g) at age 10-13 years.
RESULTS: A total of 90.9% of cases showed agreement between the question on distance vision and clinical assessment, and agreement for the near vision question was 83%. However, the correlation on an individual basis was only fair (kappa = 0.46, distance vision) to poor (kappa = 0.2, near vision). The overall agreement for the questions on cognitive ability was better than the correlation, whereas the questions on reading and mathematical ability showed low agreement and low correlation.
CONCLUSION: Questionnaire assessment of vision and cognitive ability is more suitable for studying the outcome of a large population than for identifying deficits in individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15321859      PMCID: PMC1763206          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.029470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  17 in total

1.  Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires.

Authors:  J Squires; D Bricker; L Potter
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1997-06

2.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.

Authors:  R Goodman
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 3.  Use, misuse and abuse of questionnaires on quality of life.

Authors:  C R Joyce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1995-09

4.  Comparing two methods of follow up in a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  J Fooks; L Mutch; P Yudkin; A Johnson; D Elbourne
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Validity of the 'Ten Questions' for screening serious childhood disability: results from urban Bangladesh.

Authors:  S S Zaman; N Z Khan; S Islam; S Banu; S Dixit; P Shrout; M Durkin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales as a summary of functional outcome of extremely low-birthweight children.

Authors:  P Rosenbaum; S Saigal; P Szatmari; L Hoult
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Birthweight and health and development at the age of 7 years.

Authors:  C Middle; A Johnson; F Alderdice; T Petty; A Macfarlane
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.508

8.  Parental developmental assessment of 18-month-old children: reliability and predictive value.

Authors:  K Sonnander
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.449

9.  Self-assessment of the quality of vision: association of questionnaire score with objective clinical tests.

Authors:  A Carta; L Braccio; M Belpoliti; L Soliani; F Sartore; S A Gandolfi; G Maraini
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.424

10.  Comparison of the health-related quality of life of extremely low birth weight children and a reference group of children at age eight years.

Authors:  S Saigal; D Feeny; W Furlong; P Rosenbaum; E Burrows; G Torrance
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.