Literature DB >> 10322060

Contact-evoked changes in EMG activity during human grasp.

D F Collins1, B Knight, A Prochazka.   

Abstract

Contact-evoked changes in EMG activity during human grasp. 2215 Cutaneous receptors in the digits discharge bursts of activity on contact with an object during human grasp. In this study, we investigated the contribution of this sensory activity to the responses of muscles involved in the task. Twelve subjects performed a standardized precision grasp task without the aid of vision. Electromyographic (EMG) responses in trials when the object was present were compared with those in which the object, and hence the associated afferent responses, were unexpectedly absent. Significant differences in EMG amplitude occurred in the interval 50-100 ms after contact in all subjects and in 33/46 of the muscles sampled. The differences emerged as early as 34 ms after contact and comprised as much as a fourfold change in EMG from 50 to 100 ms after contact with the object. Typically, EMG responses were larger when the object was present (OP), though there were cases, particularly in the thenar muscles, in which the responses increased when the object was absent (OA). Local anesthesia of the thumb and index finger attenuated contact-evoked EMG activity in at least one muscle in all four subjects tested. In one subject, contact-evoked responses were abolished completely during the anesthesia in all four muscles sampled. The results indicate that the sensory activity signaling contact plays a key role in regulating EMG activity during human grasp. Much of this feedback action is attributable to cutaneous receptors in the digits and probably involves both spinal and supraspinal pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10322060     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Touch perception throughout working life: effects of age and expertise.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Reuter; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Solveig Vieluf; Ben Godde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Genetically identified spinal interneurons integrating tactile afferents for motor control.

Authors:  Tuan V Bui; Nicolas Stifani; Izabela Panek; Carl Farah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Influence of tactile afferents on the coordination of muscles during a simulated precision grip.

Authors:  Tara L McIsaac; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Is the brain able to capture a new temporal relationship between a motor action and its consequence?

Authors:  Félix Berrigan; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of low force chiropractic adjustments on body surface electromagnetic field.

Authors:  John Zhang; Brian J Snyder; Lori Vernor
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-03

6.  Cutaneous sensory feedback plays a critical role in agonist-antagonist co-activation.

Authors:  Yushin Kim; Jae Kun Shim; Young-Ki Hong; Sang-Heon Lee; Bum Chul Yoon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Direct mapping rather than motor prediction subserves modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation of actions in real time.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sofia I Mc Cabe; Jorge I Villalta; Scott T Grafton; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Classification of Anticipatory Signals for Grasp and Release from Surface Electromyography.

Authors:  Ho Chit Siu; Julie A Shah; Leia A Stirling
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Continuous supplementary tactile feedback can be applied (and then removed) to enhance precision manipulation.

Authors:  Leonardo Cappello; Waleed Alghilan; Massimiliano Gabardi; Daniele Leonardis; Michele Barsotti; Antonio Frisoli; Christian Cipriani
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.262

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.