Literature DB >> 10320872

The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature review.

C Salisbury1, N Bosanquet, E K Wilkinson, P J Franks, S Kite, M Lorentzon, A Naysmith.   

Abstract

This study set out to systematically review the research evidence about the impact of alternative models of specialist palliative care on the quality of life of patients. Eighty-six relevant papers were identified and reviewed, including 22 descriptive and 27 comparative studies. We found few comparative trials of reasonable quality. There was some evidence that in-patient palliative care provided better pain control than home care of conventional hospital care, but this research was dated and open to criticism. Research on palliative home care teams and co-ordinating nurses has demonstrated limited impact on quality of life over conventional care for patients dying at home. These negative findings may be due to the limitations of the assessment tools used. There is a need for larger studies to provide clear evidence as to whether specialist palliative care services provide improvements in patients' quality of life. This review does not exclude the possibility that models of care might be justifiable on other grounds such as patient preference or cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10320872     DOI: 10.1191/026921699677461429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  11 in total

1.  Evidence based palliative care. There is some evidence-and there needs to be more.

Authors:  I J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-21

2.  Assessing palliative care is difficult.

Authors:  C Salisbury; N Bosanquet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

3.  Palliative care research: trading ethics for an evidence base.

Authors:  A M Jubb
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Development of a subject search filter to find information relevant to palliative care in the general medical literature.

Authors:  Ruth Sladek; Jennifer Tieman; Belinda S Fazekas; Amy P Abernethy; David C Currow
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

5.  Population-based study of place of death of patients with cancer: implications for GPs.

Authors:  Birgit Aabom; Jakob Kragstrup; Hindrik Vondeling; Leiv S Bakketeig; Henrik Støvring
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Expectations to and evaluation of a palliative home-care team as seen by patients and carers.

Authors:  Dorthe Goldschmidt; Lone Schmidt; Allan Krasnik; Ulla Christensen; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Changes in medical and nursing care after admission to palliative care units: a potential method for improving regional palliative care.

Authors:  Ayumi Igarashi; Tatsuya Morita; Mitsunori Miyashita; Emi Kiyohara; Satoshi Inoue
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The National Tumor Association Foundation (ANT): A 30 year old model of home palliative care.

Authors:  Marina Casadio; Guido Biasco; Amy Abernethy; Valeria Bonazzi; Raffaella Pannuti; Franco Pannuti
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the impact of sociodemographic and medical characteristics.

Authors:  M S Jordhøy; P Fayers; J H Loge; T Saltnes; M Ahlner-Elmqvist; S Kaasa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A method to determine spatial access to specialized palliative care services using GIS.

Authors:  Jonathan Cinnamon; Nadine Schuurman; Valorie A Crooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.