Literature DB >> 10320110

Activating separate ascending auditory pathways produces different human thalamic/cortical responses.

M D Waring1, C W Ponton, M Don.   

Abstract

When auditory nerve function is lost due to surgical removal of bilateral acoustic tumors in cases of neurofibromatosis type 2, a sense of hearing may be restored by means of an auditory brainstem implant (ABI), which electrically stimulates the cochlear nucleus. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses recorded from ABI subjects exhibit a variety of waveforms due to the presence or absence of different components. Evidently, ABI stimulation activates different ascending auditory pathways in different individuals. This study examined whether such differences at the brainstem level are associated with corresponding differences at higher levels. Multichannel recordings of electrically evoked middle-latency and late auditory responses were obtained from two ABI subjects whose very different electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses represent distinct categories of waveform morphology. The waveforms of both types of response were qualitatively similar in that for each condition tested there were corresponding main peaks and troughs. Quantitatively, however, there were differences in the scalp distributions and magnitudes of all components present. One subject had distributions suggesting bilateral activation and an N1-P2 complex of large amplitude, whereas the other subject had distributions suggesting unilateral activation contralateral to the side of stimulation and an N1-P2 complex of small amplitude. The differences suggest that activation of different ascending pathways in the auditory system results in different spatial and temporal patterns of neural activity in the thalamic and/or cortical auditory areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10320110     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00016-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  5 in total

1.  Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Rohit U Verma; Amélie A Guex; Kenneth E Hancock; Nedim Durakovic; Colette M McKay; Michaël C C Slama; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Sidharth V Puram; Max Smith; Barbara S Herrmann; Mary E Cunnane; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; Jess R Kerlin; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.

Authors:  Barbara S Herrmann; M Christian Brown; Donald K Eddington; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effect of anesthesia on evoked auditory responses in pediatric auditory brainstem implant surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Wong; Ruwan Kiringoda; Vivek V Kanumuri; Samuel R Barber; Kevin Franck; Nita Sahani; M Christian Brown; Barbara S Herrmann; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.