Literature DB >> 10263952

The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking.

E M Lewitt, D Coate.   

Abstract

We examine the potential for reducing cigarette smoking through increases in cigarette excise taxes by estimating the price elasticity of demand for cigarettes. Using information on individual smoking behavior from the 1976 Health Interview Survey, we estimate the adult price elasticity of demand for cigarettes to be -0.42. We find that price has its greatest effect on the smoking behavior of young males and that it operates primarily on the decision to smoke rather than via adjustments in the quantity of cigarettes smoked. An excise tax increase would discourage smoking by successive cohorts of young adults, and those reduced smoking levels would be reflected in aggregate smoking as these cohorts mature.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 10263952     DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(82)90011-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  61 in total

1.  Effect of the tobacco price support program on cigarette consumption in the United States: an updated model.

Authors:  P Zhang; C Husten; G Giovino
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health.

Authors:  M F Jacobson; K D Brownell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Simulated effect of tobacco tax variation on population health in California.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; C F Ake; S L Emery; A M Navarro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Changes at the high end of risk in cigarette smoking among US high school seniors, 1976-1995.

Authors:  L C An; P M O'Malley; J E Schulenberg; J G Bachman; L D Johnston
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Cigarette taxes and smoking during pregnancy.

Authors:  J S Ringel; W N Evans
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increase in California?

Authors:  S Emery; M M White; E A Gilpin; J P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Increasing worker and community awareness of toxic hazards in the workplace.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  State expenditures for tobacco-control programs and the tobacco settlement.

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Benny Soffer; Peter B Bach; Rahul Rajkumar; Howard P Forman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Catch them young.

Authors:  M C Taylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  The effect of state cigarette tax increases on cigarette sales, 1955 to 1988.

Authors:  D E Peterson; S L Zeger; P L Remington; H A Anderson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.