Literature DB >> 10235533

Anal ultrasound predicts the response to nonoperative treatment of fecal incontinence in men.

H Chen1, M S Humphreys, M G Kettlewell, G B Bulkley, N Mortensen, B D George.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the etiology, treatment, and utility of anal ultrasound in men with fecal incontinence and to review the outcomes of conservative (nonoperative) treatment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The etiology of fecal incontinence in women is almost exclusively from obstetric or iatrogenic surgical injuries resulting in damage to the anal sphincters and/or pudendal nerves. Corresponding data on men with fecal incontinence are sparse.
METHODS: Between January 1995 and January 1998, 37 men with fecal incontinence were evaluated in the John Radcliffe Hospital anorectal ultrasound unit. Their clinical histories, anal ultrasound results, anorectal physiology studies, and responses to conservative therapy were reviewed.
RESULTS: Median age was 57 years. Major incontinence was present in 27% of the patients. Anal ultrasound localized anal sphincter damage in nine patients, and the characteristics of these nine patients with sphincter damage were then compared with the remaining 28 without sphincter damage. Prior anal surgery was more common in patients with sphincter damage. Hemorrhoids were more common in patients without sphincter damage. Anorectal physiology studies revealed significantly lower mean maximum resting and squeeze pressures in patients with sphincter damage, confirming poor sphincter function. With 92% follow-up, patients without sphincter damage were more likely to improve with nonoperative therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal ultrasound is extremely useful in the evaluation of fecal incontinence in men. Unlike women, the majority of men do not have a sphincter defect by anal ultrasound, and conservative management is usually successful in these patients. In contrast, in men with anal sphincter damage, almost all of these defects resulted from previous anal surgery. Conservative management rarely is successful in these cases, and surgical repair of the anal sphincter may be indicated. Therefore, because the presence or absence of sphincter damage on anal ultrasound usually predicts the response to nonoperative treatment, anal ultrasound should be used to guide the initial management of men with fecal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10235533      PMCID: PMC1420819          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  13 in total

1.  Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash; S E Mathers; M M Henry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Patterns of male fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S M Sentovich; L J Rivela; G J Blatchford; M A Christensen; A G Thorson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  P J Law; M A Kamm; C I Bartram
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash; M M Henry; M Setchell
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence.

Authors:  E S Kiff; M Swash
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Fecal seepage and soiling: a problem of rectal sensation.

Authors:  B A Hoffmann; A E Timmcke; J B Gathright; T C Hicks; F G Opelka; D E Beck
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders.

Authors:  A M Roe; D C Bartolo; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Epidemiology of faecal incontinence in selected patient groups.

Authors:  P Enck; K Bielefeldt; W Rathmann; J Purrmann; D Tschöpe; J F Erckenbrecht
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson; J M Thomas; C I Bartram
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence.

Authors:  R Nelson; N Norton; E Cautley; S Furner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-08-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

2.  Functional Anorectal Disorders.

Authors:  Satish Sc Rao; Adil E Bharucha; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Richelle Felt-Bersma; Charles Knowles; Allison Malcolm; Arnold Wald
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  What Is Fecal Incontinence That Urologists Need to Know?

Authors:  HongWook Kim; Jisung Shim; Yumi Seo; Changho Lee; Youngseop Chang
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.835

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.