Literature DB >> 10235152

Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional pooled analysis.

W U Shipley1, H D Thames, H M Sandler, G E Hanks, A L Zietman, C A Perez, D A Kuban, S L Hancock, C D Smith.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evaluation leads to the early detection of both prostate cancer and recurrences following primary treatment. Prostate-specific antigen outcome information on patients 5 or more years following treatment is limited and available mainly as single-institution reports.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the likelihood and durability of tumor control using PSA evaluation 5 or more years after radical external beam radiation therapy and to identify pretreatment prognostic factors in men with early prostate cancer treated since 1988, the PSA era. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective, nonrandomized, multi-institutional pooled analysis of patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone between 1988 and 1995 at 6 US medical centers. Follow-up lasted up to a maximum of 9 years. Outcome data were analyzed using Cox regression and recursive partitioning techniques. PATIENTS: A total of 1765 men with stage T1b, T1c, and T2 tumors treated between 1988 and 1995 with external beam radiation. The majority (58%) of patients were older than 70 years and 24.2% had initial PSA values of 20 ng/mL or higher. A minimum of 2 years of subsequent follow-up was required for participation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Actuarial estimates of freedom from biochemical failure.
RESULTS: The 5-year estimates of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and the freedom from biochemical failure are 85.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.5%-87.6%), 95.1% (95% CI, 94.0%-96.2%), and 65.8% (95% CI, 62.8%-68.0%), respectively. The PSA failure-free rates 5 and 7 years after treatment for patients presenting with a PSA of less than 10 ng/mL were 77.8% (95% CI, 74.5%-81.3%), and 72.9% (95% CI, 67.9%-78.2%). Recursive partitioning analysis of initial PSA level, palpation stage, and the Gleason score groupings yielded 4 separate prognostic groups: group 1, included patients with a PSA level of less than 9.2 ng/mL; group 2, PSA level of at least 9.2 but less than 19.7 ng/mL; group 3, PSA level at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 2 to 6; and group 4, PSA level of at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 7 to 10. The estimated rates of survival free of biochemical failure at 5 years are 81 % for group 1, 69% for group 2, 47% for group 3, and 29% for group 4. Of the 302 patients followed up beyond 5 years who were free of biochemical disease, 5.0% relapsed from the fifth to the eighth year.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimated PSA control rates in this pooled analysis are similar to those of single institutions. These rates indicate the probability of success for subsets of patients with tumors of several prognostic category groupings. These results represent a multi-institutional benchmark for evidence-based counseling of prostate cancer patients about radiation treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10235152     DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  66 in total

1.  Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review.

Authors:  A Dal Pra; F L Cury; L Souhami
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Role of androgen ablation with low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashesh B Jani; Asal Shoushtari; Jeffrey M Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Prostate cancer: Focal cryotherapy freezes recurrent disease in its tracks.

Authors:  Gautum Agarwal; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Gleason score and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen in survival among patients with stage D2 prostate cancer.

Authors:  William D Figg; Michael E Franks; David Venzon; Paul Duray; Michael C Cox; W Marston Linehan; W Van Bingham; James A Eastham; Eddie Reed; Oliver Sartor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Nanoparticle-based brachytherapy spacers for delivery of localized combined chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Rajiv Kumar; Jodi Belz; Stacey Markovic; Tej Jadhav; William Fowle; Mark Niedre; Robert Cormack; Mike G Makrigiorgos; Srinivas Sridhar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Radiation therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: adjuvant or salvage?

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Andrew J Stephenson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 8.  Management of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heather Payne
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  The "PROCAINA (PROstate CAncer INdication Attitudes) Project" (Part II)--a survey among Italian radiation oncologists on radical radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Berardino De Bari; Filippo Alongi; Pierfrancesco Franco; Patrizia Ciammella; Tarik Chekrine; Lorenzo Livi; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Andrea Riccardo Filippi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Sphingosine kinase-1 is central to androgen-regulated prostate cancer growth and survival.

Authors:  Audrey Dayon; Leyre Brizuela; Claire Martin; Catherine Mazerolles; Nelly Pirot; Nicolas Doumerc; Leonor Nogueira; Muriel Golzio; Justin Teissié; Guy Serre; Pascal Rischmann; Bernard Malavaud; Olivier Cuvillier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.