Literature DB >> 10234854

Cone spacing and waveguide properties from cone directionality measurements.

S Marcos1, S A Burns.   

Abstract

Reflectometric techniques estimate the directionality of the retinal cones by measuring the distribution of light at the pupil plane of light reflected off the bleached retina. The waveguide-scattering model of Marcos et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2012 (1998)] predicts that the shape of this intensity distribution is determined by both the waveguide properties of the cone photoreceptors and the topography of the cone mosaic (cone spacing). We have performed two types of cone directionality measurement. In the first type, cone directionality estimates are obtained by measuring the spatial distribution of light returning from the retina with a single-entry pupil position (single-entry measurements). In the second type, estimates are obtained by measuring the total amount of light guided back through the pupil as a function of entry pupil position (multiple-entry measurements). As predicted by the model, single-entry measurements provide narrower distributions than the multiple-entry measurements, since the former are affected by both waveguides and scattering and the latter are affected primarily by waveguides. Measurements at different retinal eccentricities and at two different wavelengths are consistent with the model. We show that the broader multiple-entry measurements are not accounted for by cone disarray. Results of multiple-entry measurements are closer to results from measurements of the psychophysical Stiles-Crawford effect (although still narrower), and the variation with retinal eccentricity and wavelength is similar. By combining single- and multiple-entry measurements, we can estimate cone spacing. The estimates at 0- and 2-deg retinal eccentricities are in good agreement with published anatomical data.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10234854      PMCID: PMC2882181          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.16.000995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of cone directionality determined by psychophysical and reflectometric techniques.

Authors:  J C He; S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Electrodynamics of visible-light interactions with the vertebrate retinal rod.

Authors:  M J Piket-May; A Taflove; J B Troy
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Model for cone directionality reflectometric measurements based on scattering.

Authors:  S Marcos; S A Burns; J C He
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Variations in photoreceptor directionally across the central retina.

Authors:  S A Burns; S Wu; J C He; A E Elsner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Directional sensitivity of the foveal and parafoveal retina.

Authors:  J M Enoch; G M Hope
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-07

6.  Shape of the Stiles-Crawford function for traverses of the entrance pupil not passing through the peak of sensitivity.

Authors:  V Lakshminarayanan; J M Enoch
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-02

7.  A reflectometric technique for assessing photoreceptor alignment.

Authors:  J M Gorrand; F Delori
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality.

Authors:  R A Applegate; V Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Functional analysis of vision in patients after retinal detachment repair.

Authors:  C R Fitzgerald; D G Birch; J M Enoch
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-07

10.  Dependence of the magnitude of the Stiles-Crawford effect on retinal location.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparison of cone directionality determined by psychophysical and reflectometric techniques.

Authors:  J C He; S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Investigating the light absorption in a single pass through the photoreceptor layer by means of the lipofuscin fluorescence.

Authors:  Pedro M Prieto; James S McLellan; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The organization of the cone photoreceptor mosaic measured in the living human retina.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Alberto de Castro; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Laser applications and system considerations in ocular imaging.

Authors:  Ann E Elsner; Matthew S Muller
Journal:  Laser Photon Rev       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 13.138

5.  Directionality of individual cone photoreceptors in the parafoveal region.

Authors:  Hugh J Morris; Leonardo Blanco; Johanan L Codona; Simone L Li; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Measuring directionality of the retinal reflection with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.

Authors:  Weihua Gao; Ravi S Jonnal; Barry Cense; Omer P Kocaoglu; Qiang Wang; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Cone directionality from laser ray tracing in normal and LASIK patients.

Authors:  Susana Marcos; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.464

8.  Rapid measurement of individual cone photoreceptor pointing using focus diversity.

Authors:  Hugh J Morris; Johanan L Codona; Leonardo Blanco; Nathan Doble
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  Measuring retinal contributions to the optical Stiles-Crawford effect with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Weihua Gao; Barry Cense; Yan Zhang; Ravi S Jonnal; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Authors:  Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Hongxin Song; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.