Literature DB >> 10233495

An evaluation of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique.

V Kumar1, R M Kaza, I Singh, S Singhal, V Kumaran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the magnitude and range of complications encountered during no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) and to identify any limiting factor or contraindication to NSV. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 4255 men visiting a family welfare clinic of a city hospital in Delhi, India, or outpatients of the surgery department, opted for NSV; 4253 procedures were performed from September 1989 to December 1997, with two not performed because of technical difficulties. The success and complication rates were recorded.
RESULTS: The complication rates with NSV were surprisingly low; seven complications were encountered, comprising two small haematomas (0.047%), three painful nodules (0.07%), three wound infections (0.07%) and two vasal fistulae, a complication not previously described. A meticulous procedure should avoid this last complication. The mean duration of NSV was 9.5 min.
CONCLUSION: NSV is a refined and rapid technique of vasectomy with an extremely low complication rate. Being a minimally invasive procedure, it allays the fear of incision commonly encountered in men choosing vasectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10233495     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00934.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

1.  Long-term reproductive consequences of no-scalpel vasectomy in beagles.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Zhang; Xinggang Wang; Zonglin Chen; Xunbin Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-28

Review 2.  [Ischemic testicular necrosis following vasectomy: rare and typical complications of an outpatient procedure].

Authors:  N Rolfes; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  Deborah Bartz; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Advances in male contraception.

Authors:  Stephanie T Page; John K Amory; William J Bremner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Predictors of no-scalpel vasectomy acceptance in Karimnagar district, Andhra Pradesh.

Authors:  Sameer Valsangkar; Surendranath K Sai; Samir D Bele; Trupti N Bodhare
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-07

6.  Nonscalpel vasectomy as family planning method: a battle yet to be conquered.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Garg; Bhupendra Kumar Jain; Deepti Choudhary; Ashish Chaurasia; Satya Deo Pandey
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-11

Review 7.  Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michel Labrecque; Caroline Dufresne; Mark A Barone; Karine St-Hilaire
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Perception of family planning and reasons for low acceptance of NSV among married males of urban slums of Lucknow city - A community based study.

Authors:  Shazia Shafi; Uday Mohan
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-01-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.