Literature DB >> 10232537

Potential repair of rat spinal cord injuries using stimulated homologous macrophages.

M Schwartz1, O Lazarov-Spiegler, O Rapalino, I Agranov, G Velan, M Hadani.   

Abstract

The failure of the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) to regenerate after injury has long been viewed as a unique phenomenon resulting from the specific nature of this system. The finding that some CNS axons could be induced to regrow if provided with a permissive environment suggested that this failure is a result, at least in part, of the nature of the postinjury neuronal environment. It was further shown that the involvement of inflammatory cells, particularly macrophages, in postinjury processes in the CNS is limited. We have suggested that, to achieve recovery after injury, the adult mammalian CNS may require the assistance of the same postinjury factors as those involved in the recovery of spontaneously regenerating systems but that its accessibility to such assistance is restricted. Accordingly, we proposed that it might be possible to circumvent the restriction, allowing regeneration to occur. We showed that the implantation of autologous macrophages, which had been prestimulated by exposure to a regenerative (sciatic) nerve, into completely transected spinal cords of adult rats led to partial motor recovery. This treatment intervenes in the postinjury process by simulating in the axotomized CNS the events that occur naturally in spontaneously regenerating systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232537     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199905000-00057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Macrophages contribute to the maintenance of stable regenerating neurites following peripheral nerve injury.

Authors:  Hoenie W Luk; Linda J Noble; Zena Werb
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  G. Heiner Sell memorial lecture: neuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury: significance for present and future treatments.

Authors:  Volker Dietz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  A pilot study of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-g-polyethylene glycol and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-g-methylcellulose branched copolymers as injectable scaffolds for local delivery of neurotrophins and cellular transplants into the injured spinal cord.

Authors:  Lauren Conova; Jennifer Vernengo; Ying Jin; B Timothy Himes; Birgit Neuhuber; Itzhak Fischer; Anthony Lowman; Jennifer Vernengo; Ying Jin; B Timothy Himes; Birgit Neuhuber; Itzhak Fischer; Anthony Lowman
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-09-02

Review 4.  Alternatively activated macrophages in spinal cord injury and remission: another mechanism for repair?

Authors:  Taekyun Shin; Meejung Ahn; Changjong Moon; Seungjoon Kim; Ki-Bum Sim
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 5.  Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Samuel David; Antje Kroner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  The use of cellular magnetic resonance imaging to track the fate of iron-labeled multipotent stromal cells after direct transplantation in a mouse model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Laura E Gonzalez-Lara; Xiaoyun Xu; Klara Hofstetrova; Anna Pniak; Yuhua Chen; Catherine D McFadden; Francisco M Martinez-Santiesteban; Brian K Rutt; Arthur Brown; Paula J Foster
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Neonatal hydrocephalus leads to white matter neuroinflammation and injury in the corpus callosum of Ccdc39 hydrocephalic mice.

Authors:  Danielle S Goulding; R Caleb Vogel; Chirayu D Pandya; Crystal Shula; John C Gensel; Francesco T Mangano; June Goto; Brandon A Miller
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Dealing with Danger in the CNS: The Response of the Immune System to Injury.

Authors:  Sachin P Gadani; James T Walsh; John R Lukens; Jonathan Kipnis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Another barrier to regeneration in the CNS: activated macrophages induce extensive retraction of dystrophic axons through direct physical interactions.

Authors:  Kevin P Horn; Sarah A Busch; Alicia L Hawthorne; Nico van Rooijen; Jerry Silver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Macrophages promote axon regeneration with concurrent neurotoxicity.

Authors:  John C Gensel; Satoshi Nakamura; Zhen Guan; Nico van Rooijen; Daniel P Ankeny; Phillip G Popovich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.