OBJECT: The authors investigated the feasibility of using injectable hydrogels, based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm), lightly cross-linked with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or methylcellulose (MC), to serve as injectable scaffolds for local delivery of neurotrophins and cellular transplants into the injured spinal cord. The primary aims of this work were to assess the biocompatibility of the scaffolds by evaluating graft cell survival and the host tissue immune response. The scaffolds were also evaluated for their ability to promote axonal growth through the action of released brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). METHODS: The in vivo performance of PNIPAAm-g-PEG and PNIPAAm-g-MC was evaluated using a rodent model of spinal cord injury (SCI). The hydrogels were injected as viscous liquids into the injury site and formed space-filling hydrogels. The host immune response and biocompatibility of the scaffolds were evaluated at 2 weeks by histological and fluorescent immunohistochemical analysis. Commercially available matrices were used as a control and examined for comparison. RESULTS: Experiments showed that the scaffolds did not contribute to an injury-related inflammatory response. PNIPAAm-g-PEG was also shown to be an effective vehicle for delivery of cellular transplants and supported graft survival. Additionally, PNIPAAm-g-PEG and PNIPAAm-g-MC are permissive to axonal growth and can serve as injectable scaffolds for local delivery of BDNF. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, the authors suggest that these copolymers are feasible injectable scaffolds for cell grafting into the injured spinal cord and for delivery of therapeutic factors.
OBJECT: The authors investigated the feasibility of using injectable hydrogels, based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm), lightly cross-linked with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or methylcellulose (MC), to serve as injectable scaffolds for local delivery of neurotrophins and cellular transplants into the injured spinal cord. The primary aims of this work were to assess the biocompatibility of the scaffolds by evaluating graft cell survival and the host tissue immune response. The scaffolds were also evaluated for their ability to promote axonal growth through the action of released brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). METHODS: The in vivo performance of PNIPAAm-g-PEG and PNIPAAm-g-MC was evaluated using a rodent model of spinal cord injury (SCI). The hydrogels were injected as viscous liquids into the injury site and formed space-filling hydrogels. The host immune response and biocompatibility of the scaffolds were evaluated at 2 weeks by histological and fluorescent immunohistochemical analysis. Commercially available matrices were used as a control and examined for comparison. RESULTS: Experiments showed that the scaffolds did not contribute to an injury-related inflammatory response. PNIPAAm-g-PEG was also shown to be an effective vehicle for delivery of cellular transplants and supported graft survival. Additionally, PNIPAAm-g-PEG and PNIPAAm-g-MC are permissive to axonal growth and can serve as injectable scaffolds for local delivery of BDNF. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, the authors suggest that these copolymers are feasible injectable scaffolds for cell grafting into the injured spinal cord and for delivery of therapeutic factors.
Authors: Mark H Tuszynski; Ray Grill; Leonard L Jones; Adam Brant; Armin Blesch; Karin Löw; Steve Lacroix; Paul Lu Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Siobhan S McMahon; Silke Albermann; Gemma E Rooney; Cathal Moran; Jacqueline Hynes; Yolanda Garcia; Peter Dockery; Timothy O'Brien; Anthony J Windebank; Frank P Barry Journal: J Anat Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: C Wiltsey; T Christiani; J Williams; J Scaramazza; C Van Sciver; K Toomer; J Sheehan; A Branda; A Nitzl; E England; J Kadlowec; C Iftode; J Vernengo Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Craig Wiltsey; Pamela Kubinski; Thomas Christiani; Katelynn Toomer; Joseph Sheehan; Amanda Branda; Jennifer Kadlowec; Cristina Iftode; Jennifer Vernengo Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.896