Literature DB >> 10232520

MRI compatibility and visibility assessment of implantable medical devices.

B A Schueler1, T B Parrish, J C Lin, B E Hammer, B J Pangrle, E R Ritenour, J Kucharczyk, C L Truwit.   

Abstract

We have developed a protocol to evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility of implantable medical devices. The testing protocol consists of the evaluation of magnetic field-induced movement, electric current, heating, image distortion, and device operation. In addition, current induction is evaluated with a finite element analysis simulation technique that models the effect of radiofrequency fields on each device. The protocol has been applied to several implantable infusion pumps and neurostimulators with associated attachments. Experiments were performed using a 1.5-T whole-body MR system with parameters selected to approximate the intended clinical and worst case configuration. The devices exhibited moderate magnetic field-induced deflection and torque but had significant image artifacts. No heating was detected for any of the devices. Pump operation was halted in the magnetic field, but resumed after removed. Exposure to the magnetic field activated some of the neurostimulators.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232520     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199904)9:4<596::aid-jmri14>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  9 in total

1.  Phantom haptic device upgrade for use in fMRI.

Authors:  Ales Hribar; Blaz Koritnik; Marko Munih
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Quantitative assessment of artifacts on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Rozann Hansford; Menekhem M Zviman; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; David A Bluemke; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted SynchroMed EL infusion pumps.

Authors:  Felix E Diehn; Christopher P Wood; Robert E Watson; William D Mauck; Michelle M Burke; Christopher H Hunt
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ICDs and pacemakers.

Authors:  Prashant Nair; Ariel Roguin
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2005-07-01

6.  The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Joshua Kahan; Anastasia Papadaki; Mark White; Laura Mancini; Tarek Yousry; Ludvic Zrinzo; Patricia Limousin; Marwan Hariz; Tom Foltynie; John Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  PTFOS: flexible and absorbable intracranial electrodes for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Giorgio Bonmassar; Kyoko Fujimoto; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interactions between magnetic resonance imaging and dental material.

Authors:  Chalakuzhiyl Abraham Mathew; Sudhakara Maller
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2013-06

9.  Assessment of safety and interference issues of radio frequency identification devices in 0.3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

Authors:  M Periyasamy; R Dhanasekaran
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.