Literature DB >> 10231541

Binding kinetics of engineered mutants provide insight about the pathway for entering and exiting the intestinal fatty acid binding protein.

G V Richieri1, P J Low, R T Ogata, A M Kleinfeld.   

Abstract

To better understand the mechanism by which fatty acids bind to and dissociate from the binding cavities of fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs), we constructed 31 single amino acid mutants of the intestinal FABP (I-FABP) and determined the rate constants for binding and dissociation, primarily for long-chain fatty acids (FA). FA dissociation from these proteins was measured both by the ADIFAB method and by the change in tryptophan fluorescence of the FABPs. Rate constants for binding (kon) were calculated from the rate constants for dissociation (koff) and the equilibrium binding affinities. Amino acid substitutions were made at locations within the binding cavity, in the region of the gap between the betaD- and betaE-strands, and within the "portal" region of the protein. The koff values for the mutant proteins ranged from about 20-fold slower to 4-fold faster than the wild-type (WT) protein. Values for kon were as much as 20-fold slower than the WT protein, but in no case was kon significantly faster than the WT. Mutants with slower and faster koff values were generally those involving sites within the binding cavity and, relative to the WT protein, revealed higher and lower affinities, respectively. Reduced rates of binding were generally, but not exclusively, associated with sites within the portal region. For example, for F68A which is located closer to the opposite end of the protein from the portal region, the kon is more than 10-fold slower than WT. Even for these distal sites, however, the evidence is consistent with reductions in kon being due to alterations of the portal region. Binding affinities and rate constants measured as a function of ionic strength also suggest that the FA initially binds, through an electrostatic interaction, to Arg-56 on the surface of the protein, before inserting into the binding cavity. Thus, the results of this study are consistent with FA binding to I-FABP involving an initial interaction with Arg-56 followed by insertion of the FA, through the portal region, into the binding cavity and with a reversal of these steps for the dissociation reaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10231541     DOI: 10.1021/bi982703n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  8 in total

1.  Fatty acid binding proteins: same structure but different binding mechanisms? Molecular dynamics simulations of intestinal fatty acid binding protein.

Authors:  Ran Friedman; Esther Nachliel; Menachem Gutman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Functional and conformational characterization of new mutants of heart fatty acid-binding protein.

Authors:  A W Zimmerman; M Rademacher; H Rüterjans; C Lücke; J H Veerkamp
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Millisecond timescale dynamics of human liver fatty acid binding protein: testing of its relevance to the ligand entry process.

Authors:  Dong Long; Daiwen Yang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Transporter-to-trap conversion: a disulfide bond formation in cellular retinoic acid binding protein I mutant triggered by retinoic acid binding irreversibly locks the ligand inside the protein.

Authors:  Virginie Sjoelund; Igor A Kaltashov
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Modeling fatty acid delivery from intestinal fatty acid binding protein to a membrane.

Authors:  Maja Mihajlovic; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Crystallographic study of FABP5 as an intracellular endocannabinoid transporter.

Authors:  Benoît Sanson; Tao Wang; Jing Sun; Liqun Wang; Martin Kaczocha; Iwao Ojima; Dale Deutsch; Huilin Li
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2014-01-29

7.  Pheromone binding by polymorphic mouse major urinary proteins.

Authors:  Scott D Sharrow; Jeffrey L Vaughn; Lukás Zídek; Milos V Novotny; Martin J Stone
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Molecular dynamics simulation of ligand dissociation from liver fatty acid binding protein.

Authors:  Dong Long; Yuguang Mu; Daiwen Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.