Literature DB >> 10230540

[Determination of torsion angle after shaft fractures of the lower extremity--clinical relevance and measurement techniques].

P Grützner1, P Hochstein, R Simon, A Wentzensen.   

Abstract

In the treatment of femoral and tibial fractures the frontal and sagittal planes are controlled and documented by conventional X-ray films. Computed tomography permits exact measurement of the coronal plane. Between June 1993 and December 1997, 161 computed tomographic measurements of femoral torsion and 55 of tibial torsion after shaft fracture were carried out. The results were analyzed in a clinical study. A CT examination was carried out if the clinical examination aroused suspicion of a difference in torsion. 28.5% of the patients examined with femoral fractures and 23.8% of those with tibial fractures and torsion differences of more than 20 degrees. Between June 1993 and June 1997, 30 corrective derotating osteotomies of the femur and 9 of the tibia were carried out. The average preoperative difference of torsion of the femur was 29 degrees and of the tibia 25 degrees. After the operation the average femur difference was 7 degrees and of the lower leg 6.5 degrees, which are inside normal physiological limits. The osteotomies were carried out in the metaphysis near the fracture. Additional corrections in other planes were necessary on the femur in 27% and on the lower leg in 46%. With the aim of avoiding torsion differences, or at least to recognize them at an early stage, CT measurements of torsion after osteosythetic treatment of fresh unilateral femur-shaft fractures were carried out in 49 patients between October 1996 and December 1997. The torsion measurements during the operations had to be carried out clinically. No sufficiently exact method of measurement is available in the operating room. Three patients with increased differences of 28 degrees, 26 degrees or 19 degrees had their osteosyntheses corrected. The measurements after correction were inside the normal spread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10230540     DOI: 10.1007/s001040050643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  7 in total

1.  Compression nailing for posttraumatic rotational femoral deformities: open versus minimally invasive technique.

Authors:  Thomas Mückley; Christian Lerch; Oliver Gonschorek; Ivan Marintschev; Volker Bühren; Gunther O Hofmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Determining the femoral antetorsion angle with a fluoroscopy-based optoelectronic navigation system: a precision analysis].

Authors:  C Keil; J von Recum; L-P Nolte; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Femoral nail osteosynthesis. Mechanical factors influencing the femoral antetorsion].

Authors:  M Citak; D Kendoff; M Citak; M J Gardner; M Oszwald; C Krettek; T Hüfner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Post-traumatic torsional differences and functional tests following antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing of the distal femoral diaphysis].

Authors:  D G Maier; R Reisig; P Keppler; L Kinzl; F Gebhard
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Assessing leg length after fixation of comminuted femur fractures.

Authors:  Dolfi Herscovici; Julia M Scaduto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Treatment of rotational malalignment of the lower leg].

Authors:  P Keppler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Do the Loss of Thigh Muscle Strength and Tibial Malrotation Cause Anterior Knee Pain after Tibia Intramedullary Nailing?

Authors:  Emre Anıl Özbek; Mahmut Kalem; Hakan Kınık
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.