Literature DB >> 24065170

Assessing leg length after fixation of comminuted femur fractures.

Dolfi Herscovici1, Julia M Scaduto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nailing comminuted femur fractures may result in leg shortening, producing significant complications including pelvic tilt, narrowing of the hip joint space, mechanical and functional changes in gait, an increase in energy expenditures, and strains on spinal ligaments, leading to spinal deformities. The frequency of this complication in patients managed with an intramedullary (IM) nail for comminuted diaphyseal fractures is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined (1) the frequency of LLDs, (2) whether a specific fracture pattern was associated with LLDs, (3) the frequency of reoperation, and (4) whether revision fixation ultimately corrected the LLD.
METHODS: We studied 83 patients with 91 AO/OTA Type B or Type C fractures fixed with either an antegrade or retrograde IM nail from July 2002 through December 2005. There were 60 males and 23 females, with a mean age of 30 years (range, 15-79 years). All underwent a digitized CT scan in the immediate postoperative period. Measurements of both legs were performed. Any fixation producing a discrepancy and requiring a return to surgery was identified.
RESULTS: An mean LLD of 0.58 cm was found in 98% of the patients, but only six (7%) patients had an LLD of greater than 1.25 cm. No fracture pattern or the presentation of bilateral injuries demonstrated a greater incidence of LLD. Of the patients with LLD, two patients refused further surgery while the remaining four patients, two Type B and two Type C fractures, ultimately underwent revision fixation. Repeat CT scans after revision surgery of all four patients demonstrated a residual LLD of only 0.2 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative CT scans appear to be an efficient method to measure femoral length after IM nailing. Although residual LLDs may be common in comminuted femurs treated with IM nails, most LLDs do not appear to be functionally relevant. When an LLD of greater than 1.5 cm is identified, it should be discussed with the patient, who should be told that potential complications may occur with larger LLDs and that sometimes patients may benefit from repeat surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24065170      PMCID: PMC4117917          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3292-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

1.  Asymmetric limb loading with true or simulated leg-length differences.

Authors:  Scott C White; Louise A Gilchrist; Bryan E Wilk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy.

Authors:  Anne H Leitzes; Hollis G Potter; Terry Amaral; Robert G Marx; Stephen Lyman; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Avoiding rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur by using the profile of the lesser trochanter: an in vitro study.

Authors:  R L Jaarsma; N Verdonschot; R van der Venne; A van Kampen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Comparison of orthoroentgenography and computed tomography in the measurement of limb-length discrepancy.

Authors:  A Aaron; D Weinstein; D Thickman; R Eilert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Limb length discrepancies of the lower extremity (the short leg syndrome).

Authors:  S I Subotnick
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Leg length discrepancies in adult femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Levent Karapinar; Ahmet Kaya; Hasan Oztürk; Taşkin Altay; Cemil Kayali
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2009-05

Review 7.  Lower limb-length discrepancy.

Authors:  R S Siffert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality.

Authors:  O Friberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effect of limb-length discrepancy on gait.

Authors:  K M Song; S E Halliday; D G Little
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Acute lengthening of shortened lower extremities after malunion or non-union of a fracture.

Authors:  E E Johnson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Suitability of computer-assisted femoral intramedullary nailing for control of torsion and length : Systematic review of clinical studies].

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Christian Krettek; Nael Hawi
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Distal femoral complications following antegrade intramedullary nail placement.

Authors:  Amanda J Fantry; Gregory Elia; Bryan G Vopat; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-03-24

3.  Femur Lengthening in a Patient with a Pseudoaneurysm of the Superficial Femoral Artery Treated with Covered Stent.

Authors:  Charles Dejean; Mathieu Desvergnes; Pierre Bouget; Philippe Rigoard; Tanguy Vendeuvre
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  One-Stage Closed Intramedullary Nailing for Delayed Femoral Fracture in Multiple Injured Patients.

Authors:  Ruijian Yan; Yifan Wu; Yiying Qi; Hang Li; Shurong Dong; Gang Feng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Bone Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Nail in 34 Patients with Posttraumatic Limb Length Discrepancies.

Authors:  Maxime Teulières; Tristan Langlais; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Jan Duedal Rölfing; Franck Accadbled
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.