Literature DB >> 10226926

Can we learn from eugenics?

D Wikler1.   

Abstract

Eugenics casts a long shadow over contemporary genetics. Any measure, whether in clinical genetics or biotechnology, which is suspected of eugenic intent is likely to be opposed on that ground. Yet there is little consensus on what this word signifies, and often only a remote connection to the very complex set of social movements which took that name. After a brief historical summary of eugenics, this essay attempts to locate any wrongs inherent in eugenic doctrines. Four candidates are examined and rejected. The moral challenge posed by eugenics for genetics in our own time, I argue, is to achieve social justice.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Nineteenth Century; Twentieth Century

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10226926      PMCID: PMC479205          DOI: 10.1136/jme.25.2.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Bioethics and anti-bioethics in light of Nazi medicine: what must we remember?

Authors:  D Wikler; J Barondess
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1993-03

2.  The race hygiene movement in Germany.

Authors:  S Weiss
Journal:  Osiris       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 0.548

3.  Geneticists and the eugenics movement in Scandinavia.

Authors:  N Roll-Hansen
Journal:  Br J Hist Sci       Date:  1989-09

4.  Eugenics in Britain.

Authors:  D MacKenzie
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 3.885

5.  Healing society: medical language in American eugenics.

Authors:  D Kamrat-Lang
Journal:  Sci Context       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 0.425

6.  A window on the past: the position of the client in twentieth century public health thought and practice.

Authors:  C Muller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Eugenics and public health in American history.

Authors:  M S Pernick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.308

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines.

Authors:  W Henn
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Should doctors intentionally do less than the best?

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Screening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility.

Authors:  Ehud Karavani; Or Zuk; Danny Zeevi; Nir Barzilai; Nikos C Stefanis; Alex Hatzimanolis; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Leonid Kruglyak; Gil Atzmon; Max Lam; Todd Lencz; Shai Carmi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Genetic information in the age of genohype.

Authors:  Péter Kakuk
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

6.  From Genotype to Phenotype: Polygenic Prediction of Complex Human Traits.

Authors:  Timothy G Raben; Louis Lello; Erik Widen; Stephen D H Hsu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Queerin' the PGD clinic : human enhancement and the future of bodily diversity.

Authors:  Robert Sparrow
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2013-06

8.  The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators' interests.

Authors:  Giulia Cavaliere
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-03

9.  From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification.

Authors:  Derek So
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Continuing the conversation about public health ethics: education for public health professionals in Europe.

Authors:  Lisa M Lee; Miguel Ángel Royo-Bordonada
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2015-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.