Literature DB >> 10225466

Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis with noninvasive methods.

S P Patsilinakos1, A I Kranidis, I P Antonelis, G Filippatos, I K Houssianakou, N I Zamanis, E Sioras, T Tsiotika, F Kardaras, L P Anthopoulos.   

Abstract

Exercise stress ECG testing is not generally recommended in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Analysis of the utility of exercise testing, both with and without the use of myocardial thallium-201 scintigraphy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), yielded low specificity. A noninvasive, safe, and accurate diagnostic modality to ascertain the presence of CAD is not available to date for patients with severe aortic stenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress echocardiography (A-Stress-Echo) and of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (A-SPECT), for the detection of CAD in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The study included 50 patients with severe aortic stenosis (maximal instantaneous aortic valve gradient >80 mmHg, range 81 to 144 mmHg, and aortic valve area <0.75 cm2). All patients were submitted to A-Stress-Echo, after a 6-minute infusion of adenosine (140 microg/kg body weight/min), and then (>3 days later) A-SPECT with the same dosage of adenosine as above. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients. No major complications were observed. The unpleasant symptoms were brief and did not necessitate cessation of the test. Both modalities showed the same sensitivity (85% for A-SPECT and 85% for A-Stress-Echo) angiographically diagnosed CAD while A-Stress-Echo yielded much higher specificity (96.7% vs 76.7%). Concordance of the two methods was found in 40 cases and the specificity for those patients was 100%. A-Stress-Echo and A-SPECT, either separately or in combination, constitute excellent and safe noninvasive diagnostic methods in detecting CAD in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10225466     DOI: 10.1177/000331979905000406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angiology        ISSN: 0003-3197            Impact factor:   3.619


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of valvular heart disease: implications for nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Blasé Carabello
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Eight-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography evaluation of significant coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Miia Holmström; Mikko A Sillanpää; Markku Kupari; Sari Kivistö; Kirsi Lauerma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  The use of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging in severe aortic stenosis: Is it time for a new prospective study?

Authors:  Ioannis Parastatidis; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Edward Danson; Peter Hansen; Sayan Sen; Justin Davies; Ian Meredith; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  An assessment of the safety, hemodynamic response, and diagnostic accuracy of commonly used vasodilator stressors in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Nasir Hussain; Waseem Chaudhry; Alan W Ahlberg; Richard S Amara; Ahmed Elfar; Matthew W Parker; John A Savino; Ruwanthi Titano; Milena J Henzlova; William L Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion tomographic imaging in patients with significant aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Sotirios P Patsilinakos; Stavros Spanodimos; Fivi Rontoyanni; Athanasios Kranidis; Ioannis P Antonelis; Konstantinos Sotirellos; Dionysios Antonatos; Elias Tsaglis; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Dimitris Tsigas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The comparative value of the aortic atherosclerosis and the coronary flow velocity reserve evaluated by stress transesophageal echocardiography in the prediction of patients with aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Attila Nemes; Tamás Forster; Attila Thury; Zsolt Kovács; Krisztina Boda; Miklós Csanády
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Coronary Assessment and Revascularization Before Transcutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation: An Update on Current Knowledge.

Authors:  Muhammad Sabbah; Thomas Engstrøm; Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard; Jacob Lønborg
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 10.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jo M Zelis; Pim A L Tonino; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Richard L Kirkeeide; K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.