Literature DB >> 14752468

Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion tomographic imaging in patients with significant aortic stenosis.

Sotirios P Patsilinakos1, Stavros Spanodimos, Fivi Rontoyanni, Athanasios Kranidis, Ioannis P Antonelis, Konstantinos Sotirellos, Dionysios Antonatos, Elias Tsaglis, Nikolaos Nikolaou, Dimitris Tsigas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy has been used by some investigators for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with mild, moderate, and moderate to severe aortic stenosis, with various results. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (adenosine single photon emission computed tomography [Ad-SPECT]) for the detection of CAD in patients with significant aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULT: The study included 75 patients with significant aortic stenosis (maximal instantaneous aortic valve gradient >80 mm Hg [range, 81-149 mm Hg] and aortic valve area <0.75 cm2). All patients underwent Ad-SPECT after a 6-minute infusion of adenosine (140 microg/kg body weight per minute). At the third minute of adenosine infusion, a bolus of 3 mCi thallium 201 was injected, and SPECT acquisition was obtained immediately after completion of adenosine infusion. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients. No major complications during adenosine infusion were observed. All unpleasant symptoms lasted for only a few seconds and did not necessitate cessation of the test. Concerning the angiographically diagnosed CAD, we found that Ad-SPECT showed a sensitivity of 88.6%, a specificity of 72.5%, a positive predictive value of 73.8%, a negative predictive value of 87.8%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 80%.
CONCLUSIONS: Ad-SPECT is a moderately accurate method for detecting the presence or absence of CAD in patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, further modification of this method is required before it can supplant cardiac catheterization in the preoperative evaluation of patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752468     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  18 in total

1.  Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging in aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  I K Bailey; P C Come; D T Kelly; R D Burow; L S Griffith; H W Strauss; B Pitt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Changing aspects of the natural history of valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  A Selzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Detection of coronary artery disease by thallium imaging using a combined intravenous dipyridamole and isometric handgrip test in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  H V Huikuri; U R Korhonen; M J Ikäheimo; J Heikkilä; J T Takkunen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Exercise testing in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J E Atwood; S Kawanishi; J Myers; V F Froelicher
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic valvular disease.

Authors:  A H Hakki; D Kimbiris; A S Iskandrian; B L Segal; G S Mintz; C E Bemis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Left ventricular hypertrophy sensitizes the myocardium to the development of ischaemia.

Authors:  E E Salcedo; T H Marwick; D H Korzick; M Goormastic; R T Go
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Stress echocardiography in elderly patients with coronary artery disease: applicability, safety and prognostic value of dobutamine and adenosine echocardiography in elderly patients.

Authors:  L P Anthopoulos; M S Bonou; F G Kardaras; E P Sioras; D N Kardara; A M Sideris; A I Kranidis; N G Margaris
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Computer-assisted evaluation of dipyridamole thallium-201 SPECT in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  P Rask; K Karp; B Edlund; P Eriksson; T Mooe; U Wiklund
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by controlled coronary vasodilation with adenosine and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise.

Authors:  M S Verani; J J Mahmarian; J B Hixson; T M Boyce; R A Staudacher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Exclusion of coronary artery disease by exercise thallium-201 tomography in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  M Kupari; K S Virtanen; H Turto; M Viitasalo; M Mänttäri; M Lindroos; E Koskela; H Leinonen; S Pohjola-Sintonen; J Heikkilä
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  9 in total

1.  Stress positron emission tomography is safe and can guide coronary revascularization in high-risk patients being considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Paul C Cremer; Shaden Khalaf; Junyang Lou; Leonardo Rodriguez; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Eight-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography evaluation of significant coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Miia Holmström; Mikko A Sillanpää; Markku Kupari; Sari Kivistö; Kirsi Lauerma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Assessment, treatment, and prognostic implications of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Edward Danson; Peter Hansen; Sayan Sen; Justin Davies; Ian Meredith; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01

6.  An assessment of the safety, hemodynamic response, and diagnostic accuracy of commonly used vasodilator stressors in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Nasir Hussain; Waseem Chaudhry; Alan W Ahlberg; Richard S Amara; Ahmed Elfar; Matthew W Parker; John A Savino; Ruwanthi Titano; Milena J Henzlova; William L Duvall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Challenges in Diagnosis and Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Srdjan Aleksandric; Marko Banovic; Branko Beleslin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-11

8.  The clinical value and safety of ECG-gated dipyridamole myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Fang-Shin Liu; Shan-Ying Wang; Yu-Chien Shiau; Yen-Wen Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jo M Zelis; Pim A L Tonino; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Richard L Kirkeeide; K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.