Literature DB >> 10222376

Genetic testing and the clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988: present and future.

M K Schwartz1.   

Abstract

CLIA '88 superseded CLIA '67. CLIA '88 set standards designed to improve quality and expanded federal oversight to virtually all clinical laboratories in the United States. Presumably because genetics testing was then in its infancy, CLIA '88 did not devote a special section to genetics testing. Biochemical and immunochemical tests used to evaluate inborn errors of metabolism and other genetic entities were categorized as analytes in the Clinical Chemistry section, and DNA probes used primarily in infectious disease were included in Microbiology. The legal, social, economic, and ethical implications of genetic testing and the rapid commercialization of these tests led to recommendations that genetic testing be defined as a laboratory specialty with a subsection in CLIA. The advisory committee created under CLIA was assigned to review these recommendations. The committee agreed that genetics testing was sufficiently different from other areas already included in CLIA to warrant a separate section. Two definitions were adopted. The more clear-cut one is for molecular genetic and cytogenic tests. This includes the analysis of human DNA/RNA in evaluating genetic diseases. The second definition is not as clear-cut and is for the analysis of proteins and metabolites used predominantly to detect inborn errors of metabolism. Many of these analytes already are categorized according to their uses for other purposes. The recommendations for genetic testing include detailed and specific proposals concerning personnel, confidentiality and informed consent, quality control, contamination, proficiency testing, validation of tests, special reporting, retention of records, and reuse of tested specimens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10222376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  11 in total

Review 1.  Keeping up with the next generation: massively parallel sequencing in clinical diagnostics.

Authors:  John R ten Bosch; Wayne W Grody
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Population screening for hemochromatosis: has the time finally come?

Authors:  J C Barton; R T Acton
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-02

Review 3.  Use of contemporary genetics in cardiovascular diagnosis.

Authors:  Alfred L George
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The spectrum of genetic variants in hereditary pancreatic cancer includes Fanconi anemia genes.

Authors:  Thomas P Slavin; Susan L Neuhausen; Bita Nehoray; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Ilana Solomon; Christina Rybak; Kathleen Blazer; Aaron Adamson; Kai Yang; Sharon Sand; Nancy Guerrero-Llamas; Danielle Castillo; Josef Herzog; Xiwei Wu; Shu Tao; Shivali Raja; Vincent Chung; Gagandeep Singh; Sue Nadesan; Sandra Brown; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Gloria M Petersen; Jeffrey Weitzel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Misha Angrist; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Christopher Heaney; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.864

Review 6.  Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; Carol Farhangfar; John Mendelsohn; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Impact of genetics on the clinical management of channelopathies.

Authors:  Peter J Schwartz; Michael J Ackerman; Alfred L George; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  FDA's Proposed Guidance for Laboratory Developed Tests: How Should Regulators Balance the Risks and Promise of Innovation in Clinical Genetics?

Authors:  Michelle Bayefsky; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  FDLIs Food Drug Policy Forum       Date:  2015-02-25

9.  Identification of Incidental Germline Mutations in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Who Underwent Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Thomas P Slavin; Kimberly C Banks; Darya Chudova; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Justin I Odegaard; Rebecca J Nagy; Kar Wing Kevin Tsang; Susan L Neuhausen; Stacy W Gray; Massimo Cristofanilli; Angel A Rodriguez; Aditya Bardia; Brian Leyland-Jones; Mike F Janicek; Michael Lilly; Guru Sonpavde; Christine E Lee; Richard B Lanman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Razelle Kurzrock; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Caron Strahlendorf; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers; Colleen O'Connell; Eric Bouffet; David Malkin; Nada Jabado; Kym Boycott; Poul H Sorensen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.