Literature DB >> 20393304

Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for long QT syndrome.

Misha Angrist1, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Christopher Heaney, Robert Cook-Deegan.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for long QT syndrome exemplifies patenting and exclusive licensing with different outcomes at different times. Exclusive licensing from the University of Utah changed the business model from sole provider to two US providers of long QT syndrome testing. Long QT syndrome is associated with mutations in many genes, 12 of which are now tested by two competing firms in the United States, PGxHealth and GeneDx. Until 2009, PGxHealth was the sole provider, based largely on exclusive rights to patents from the University of Utah and elsewhere. University of Utah patents were initially licensed to DNA Sciences, whose patent rights were acquired by Genaissance, and then by Clinical Data, Inc., which owns PGxHealth. In 2002, DNA Sciences, Inc., "cleared the market" by sending cease-and-desist patent enforcement letters to university and reference laboratories offering long QT syndrome genetic testing. There was no test on the market for a 1- to 2-year period. From 2005-2008, most long QT syndrome-related patents were controlled by Clinical Data, Inc., and its subsidiary PGxHealth. Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc., secured countervailing exclusive patent rights starting in 2006, also from the University of Utah, and broke the PGxHealth monopoly in early 2009, creating a duopoly for genetic testing in the United States and expanding the number of genes for which commercial testing is available from 5 to 12.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393304      PMCID: PMC3021512          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d68293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.864


  80 in total

1.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.

Authors:  Paul C D Johnson; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  Dan M Roden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA); Fecal Occult Blood (FOB) Testing. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-10-20

Review 4.  Genetic testing for risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and long QT syndrome: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Effectiveness and limitations of beta-blocker therapy in congenital long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  A J Moss; W Zareba; W J Hall; P J Schwartz; R S Crampton; J Benhorin; G M Vincent; E H Locati; S G Priori; C Napolitano; A Medina; L Zhang; J L Robinson; K Timothy; J A Towbin; M L Andrews
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Spectrum and prevalence of cardiac sodium channel variants among black, white, Asian, and Hispanic individuals: implications for arrhythmogenic susceptibility and Brugada/long QT syndrome genetic testing.

Authors:  Michael J Ackerman; Igor Splawski; Jonathan C Makielski; David J Tester; Melissa L Will; Katherine W Timothy; Mark T Keating; Gregg Jones; Monica Chadha; Christopher R Burrow; J Claiborne Stephens; Chuanbo Xu; Richard Judson; Mark E Curran
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Genomic organization of the KCNQ1 K+ channel gene and identification of C-terminal mutations in the long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  N Neyroud; P Richard; N Vignier; C Donger; I Denjoy; L Demay; M Shkolnikova; R Pesce; P Chevalier; B Hainque; P Coumel; K Schwartz; P Guicheney
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1999-02-19       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Prevalence of early-onset atrial fibrillation in congenital long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan N Johnson; David J Tester; James Perry; Benjamin A Salisbury; Carol R Reed; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Postmortem genetic testing for conventional autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death: an evaluation of different DNA extraction protocols and the feasibility of mutational analysis from archival paraffin-embedded heart tissue.

Authors:  Elisa Carturan; David J Tester; Brian C Brost; Cristina Basso; Gaetano Thiene; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Positional cloning of a novel potassium channel gene: KVLQT1 mutations cause cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Q Wang; M E Curran; I Splawski; T C Burn; J M Millholland; T J VanRaay; J Shen; K W Timothy; G M Vincent; T de Jager; P J Schwartz; J A Toubin; A J Moss; D L Atkinson; G M Landes; T D Connors; M T Keating
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  9 in total

1.  Genetics and cardiovascular disease: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Euan A Ashley; Ray E Hershberger; Colleen Caleshu; Patrick T Ellinor; Joe G N Garcia; David M Herrington; Carolyn Y Ho; Julie A Johnson; Steven J Kittner; Calum A Macrae; Gia Mudd-Martin; Daniel J Rader; Dan M Roden; Derek Scholes; Frank W Sellke; Jeffrey A Towbin; Jennifer Van Eyk; Bradford B Worrall
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Patents in genomics and human genetics.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Christopher Heaney
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Gene Patents in Canada: Is There a New Legal Landscape?

Authors:  Katherine J Bonter; Carmela De Luca; Christi J Guerrini
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Cystic Fibrosis Patents: A Case Study of Successful Licensing.

Authors:  Mollie A Minear; Cristina Kapustij; Kaeleen Boden; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  LES Nouv       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 5.  Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States.

Authors:  Ashwin Agarwal; Lauren C Sayres; Mildred K Cho; Robert Cook-Deegan; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Gene patents and personalized cancer care: impact of the Myriad case on clinical oncology.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit; Angela Bradbury; Courtney Storm; Jon F Merz; Kevin E Noonan; Rebecca Spence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Predicting Genetic Variation Severity Using Machine Learning to Interpret Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Matthew D McCoy; John Hamre; Dmitri K Klimov; M Saleet Jafri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  DNA patents and diagnostics: not a pretty picture.

Authors:  Julia Carbone; E Richard Gold; Bhaven Sampat; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Lori Knowles; Misha Angrist; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Gene patents still alive and kicking: their impact on provision of genetic testing for long QT syndrome in the Canadian public health-care system.

Authors:  Sarah E Ali-Khan; E Richard Gold
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.